Application of species distribution models to explain and predict the distribution, abundance and assemblage structure of nearshore temperate reef fishes

被引:50
|
作者
Young, Mary [1 ,2 ]
Carr, Mark H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Ctr Integrat Ecol, Warrnambool, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
generalized additive models; marine landscape ecology; marine protected areas; marine spatial management; species distribution models; temperate reef fishes; MARINE PROTECTED AREAS; CALIFORNIA; HABITAT; BIODIVERSITY; RESPONSES; NETWORK; DESIGN; KELP; BATHYMETRY; VEGETATION;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.12378
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim The purpose of this study was to create predictive species distribution models (SDMs) for temperate reef-associated fish species densities and fish assemblage diversity and richness to aid in marine conservation and spatial planning. Location California, USA. Methods Using generalized additive models, we associated fish species densities and assemblage characteristics with seafloor structure, giant kelp biomass and wave climate and used these associations to predict the distribution and assemblage structure across the study area. We tested the accuracy of these predicted extrapolations using an independent data set. The SDMs were also used to estimate larger scale abundances to compare with other estimates of species abundance (uniform density extrapolation over rocky reef and density extrapolations taking into account variations in geomorphic structure). Results The SDMs successfully modelled the species-habitat relationships of seven rocky reef-associated fish species and showed that species' densities differed in their relationships with environmental variables. The predictive accuracy of the SDMs ranged from 0.26 to 0.60 (Pearson's r correlation between observed and predicted density values). The SDMs created for the fish assemblage-level variables had higher prediction accuracies with Pearson's r values of 0.61 for diversity and 0.71 for richness. The comparisons of the different methods for extrapolating species densities over a single marine protected area varied greatly in their abundance estimates with the uniform extrapolation (density values extrapolated evenly over the rocky reef) always estimating much greater abundances. The other two methods, which took into account variation in the geomorphic structure of the reef, provided much lower abundance estimates. Main conclusions Species distribution models that combine geomorphic, oceanographic and biogenic habitat variables can reliably predict spatial patterns of species density and assemblage attributes of temperate reef fishes at spatial scales of 50m. Thus, SDMs show great promise for informing spatial and ecosystem-based approaches to conservation and fisheries management.
引用
收藏
页码:1428 / 1440
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Models to predict the distribution and abundance of breeding ducks in Canada
    Barker, Nicole K. S.
    Cumming, Steven G.
    Darveau, Marcel
    AVIAN CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGY, 2014, 9 (02)
  • [2] Patterns of distribution and abundance of the temperate sea cucumber Australostichopus mollis on a rocky subtidal reef
    Morgan, A. D.
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2011, 38 (03) : 195 - 206
  • [3] Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns
    Pineda, Eduardo
    Lobo, Jorge M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2009, 78 (01) : 182 - 190
  • [4] Testing species assemblage predictions from stacked and joint species distribution models
    Zurell, Damaris
    Zimmermann, Niklaus E.
    Gross, Helge
    Baltensweiler, Andri
    Sattler, Thomas
    Wuest, Rafael O.
    JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2020, 47 (01) : 101 - 113
  • [5] Species distribution models predict temporal but not spatial variation in forest growth
    van der Maaten, Ernst
    Hamann, Andreas
    van der Maaten-Theunissen, Marieke
    Bergsma, Aldo
    Hengeveld, Geerten
    van Lammeren, Ron
    Mohren, Frits
    Nabuurs, Gert-Jan
    Terhurne, Renske
    Sterck, Frank
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 7 (08): : 2585 - 2594
  • [6] A quantitative review of abundance-based species distribution models
    Waldock, Conor
    Stuart-Smith, Rick D.
    Albouy, Camille
    Cheung, William W. L.
    Edgar, Graham J.
    Mouillot, David
    Tjiputra, Jerry
    Pellissier, Loic
    ECOGRAPHY, 2022, 2022 (01)
  • [7] Phytoplankton functional group dynamics explain species abundance distribution in a directionally changing environment
    Tsai, Cheng-Han
    Miki, Takeshi
    Chang, Chun-Wei
    Ishikawa, Kanako
    Ichise, Satoshi
    Kumagai, Michio
    Hsieh, Chih-Hao
    ECOLOGY, 2014, 95 (12) : 3335 - 3343
  • [8] An assembly rule could explain the canonical property of the lognormal species-abundance distribution
    Simon Lopez-Villalta, Julian
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (04) : 315 - 322
  • [9] Hybrid Bayesian network classifiers: Application to species distribution models
    Aguilera, P. A.
    Fernandez, A.
    Reche, F.
    Rumi, R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2010, 25 (12) : 1630 - 1639
  • [10] Ichthyoplankton abundance, distribution, and assemblage structure in the Gulf of Alaska during September 2000 and 2001
    Lanksbury, JA
    Duffy-Anderson, JT
    Mier, KL
    Wilson, MT
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2005, 64 (04) : 775 - 785