Fouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes Processing Swine Wastewater Pretreated by Mechanical Separation and Aerobic Biofiltration

被引:14
作者
Masse, L. [1 ]
Mondor, M. [2 ]
Talbot, G. [1 ]
Deschenes, L. [2 ]
Drolet, H. [2 ]
Gagnon, N. [1 ]
St-Germain, F. [2 ]
Puig-Bargues, J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Dairy & Swine Res & Dev Ctr, Sherbrooke, PQ J1M 0C8, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Food Res & Dev Ctr, St Hyacinthe, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Girona, Dept Chem & Agr Engn & Technol, Girona Carrer Maria Aurelia Capmany, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
swine wastewater; reverse osmosis; fouling; biofouling; NATURAL ORGANIC-MATTER; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; MANURE; FOULANTS; GENE; FTIR; ATR;
D O I
10.1080/01496395.2014.881880
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The development of cleaning strategies for RO membranes processing highly charged wastewaters requires knowledge about foulant composition. The objective of this study was to characterize the fouling layer that formed on RO membranes processing swine wastewater pretreated by a mechanical solid-liquid separator (LF) and aerobic biofiltration (AE). The two LF effluents represented swine wastewater concentrated three (LF1) and four (LF2) times with BW30 (36 bar) and SW30 (60 bar) membranes, respectively. Flux decline was slightly higher with LF2-SW30 (37.1%) than LF1-BW30 (31.8%) after 20 h of filtration. The fouling layer had significantly higher protein concentration on LF2-SW30 than on LF1-BW30, but both had similar microbial content and inorganic composition. The AE effluents were concentrated by a factor of 7 and processed at pH 5.75 (AE1) and 8.07 (AE2) with BW30 membranes. Both AE effluents had higher calcium but lower suspended solids and organics than the LF effluents. They generated significantly higher flux decline and biofouling than LF1. High flux decline was also associated with increased protein attachment for AE1 and inorganic fouling for AE2. A mechanical separator may be adequate to prepare swine wastewater for RO filtration but the aerobic pretreatment would allow for a higher volumetric concentration of the effluent.
引用
收藏
页码:1298 / 1308
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Protein (BSA) fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: Implications for wastewater reclamation
    Ang, Wui Seng
    Elimelech, Menachem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2007, 296 (1-2) : 83 - 92
  • [2] Fouling and cleaning of RO membranes fouled by mixtures of organic foulants simulating wastewater effluent
    Ang, Wui Seng
    Tiraferri, Alberto
    Chen, Kai Loon
    Elimelech, Menachem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2011, 376 (1-2) : 196 - 206
  • [3] REMOVAL OF AMMONIUM AND NITRATE IONS FROM MINE EFFLUENTS BY MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY
    AWADALLA, FT
    STRIEZ, C
    LAMB, K
    [J]. SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 29 (04) : 483 - 495
  • [4] Physico-chemical characteristics and methanogen communities in swine and dairy manure storage tanks: Spatio-temporal variations and impact on methanogenic activity
    Barret, Maialen
    Gagnon, Nathalie
    Topp, Edward
    Masse, Lucie
    Masse, Daniel I.
    Talbot, Guylaine
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2013, 47 (02) : 737 - 746
  • [5] Influence of membrane and colloid characteristics on fouling of nanofiltration membranes
    Boussu, K.
    Belpaire, A.
    Volodin, A.
    Van Haesendonck, C.
    Van der Meeren, P.
    Vandecasteele, C.
    Van der Bruggen, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2007, 289 (1-2) : 220 - 230
  • [6] Childress A. E., 2012, 4102 WAT RES FDN
  • [7] Mapping of protein fouling by FTIR-ATR as experimental tool to study fluid velocity profile in spiral membrane
    Delaunay, David
    Rabiller-Baudry, Murielle
    Paugam, Lydie
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2006, 200 (1-3) : 205 - 207
  • [8] Flemming H. C., 2011, BIOFILM HUGHLIGHTS F
  • [9] Reverse osmosis membrane biofouling
    Flemming, HC
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE, 1997, 14 (04) : 382 - 391
  • [10] TFC polyamide membranes modified by grafting of hydrophilic polymers: an FT-IR/AFM/TEM study
    Freger, V
    Gilron, J
    Belfer, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2002, 209 (01) : 283 - 292