Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures

被引:169
作者
McDonald, Anthony D. [1 ]
Alambeigi, Hananeh [2 ]
Engstrom, Johan [3 ]
Markkula, Gustav [4 ]
Vogelpohl, Tobias [5 ]
Dunne, Jarrett [6 ]
Yuma, Norbert [6 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Ind & Syst Engn, College Stn, TX USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Human Factors & Machine Learning Lab, College Stn, TX USA
[3] Virginia Tech Transportat Inst, Blacksburg, VA USA
[4] Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Psychol, Dept Engn & Traff Psychol, Braunschweig, Germany
[6] Texas A&M Univ, 4075 Emerging Technol Bldg,101 Bizzell St, College Stn, TX 77845 USA
关键词
autonomous driving; driver behavior; simulation; meta-analysis; control theory; AUTONOMOUS EMERGENCY BRAKING; CAR-FOLLOWING MODEL; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; VEHICLE CONTROL; SITUATION AWARENESS; VISUAL CONTROL; COLLISION-AVOIDANCE; SENSORY DYNAMICS; TASK ENGAGEMENT; CRITICAL EVENTS;
D O I
10.1177/0018720819829572
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: This article provides a review of empirical studies of automated vehicle takeovers and driver modeling to identify influential factors and their impacts on takeover performance and suggest driver models that can capture them. Background: Significant safety issues remain in automated-to-manual transitions of vehicle control. Developing models and computer simulations of automated vehicle control transitions may help designers mitigate these issues, but only if accurate models are used. Selecting accurate models requires estimating the impact of factors that influence takeovers. Method: Articles describing automated vehicle takeovers or driver modeling research were identified through a systematic approach. Inclusion criteria were used to identify relevant studies and models of braking, steering, and the complete takeover process for further review. Results: The reviewed studies on automated vehicle takeovers identified several factors that significantly influence takeover time and post-takeover control. Drivers were found to respond similarly between manual emergencies and automated takeovers, albeit with a delay. The findings suggest that existing braking and steering models for manual driving may be applicable to modeling automated vehicle takeovers. Conclusion: Time budget, repeated exposure to takeovers, silent failures, and handheld secondary tasks significantly influence takeover time. These factors in addition to takeover request modality, driving environment, non-handheld secondary tasks, level of automation, trust, fatigue, and alcohol significantly impact post-takeover control. Models that capture these effects through evidence accumulation were identified as promising directions for future work. Application: Stakeholders interested in driver behavior during automated vehicle takeovers may use this article to identify starting points for their work.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 688
页数:47
相关论文
共 211 条
[1]   Identification of a Linear Parameter Varying Driver Model for the Detection of Distraction [J].
Ameyoe, Ablamvi ;
Chevrel, Philippe ;
Le-Carpentier, Eric ;
Mars, Franck ;
Illy, Herve .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2015, 48 (26) :37-42
[2]   Optical information for car following: The driving by visual angle (DVA) model [J].
Andersen, George J. ;
Sauer, Craig W. .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2007, 49 (05) :878-896
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Modelling Driver Behaviour in Automotive Environments, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-84628-618-6_11
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P 5 INT C APPL HUM F
[5]   Effects of forward collision warning and repeated event exposure on emergency braking [J].
Aust, Mikael Ljung ;
Engstrom, Johan ;
Vistrom, Matias .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 18 :34-46
[6]  
Bainbridge L., 1983, Ironies of Automation', P129, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-029348-6.50026-9
[7]   Analysis of driver roles: modelling the changing role of the driver in automated driving systems using EAST [J].
Banks, Victoria A. ;
Stanton, Neville A. .
THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2019, 20 (03) :284-300
[8]   Driver error or designer error: Using the Perceptual Cycle Model to explore the circumstances surrounding the fatal Tesla crash on 7th May 2016 [J].
Banks, Victoria A. ;
Plant, Katherine L. ;
Stanton, Neville A. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 108 :278-285
[9]   Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study [J].
Banks, Victoria A. ;
Eriksson, Alexander ;
O'Donoghue, Jim ;
Stanton, Neville A. .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2018, 68 :138-145
[10]   Driver-centred vehicle automation: using network analysis for agent-based modelling of the driver in highly automated driving systems [J].
Banks, Victoria A. ;
Stanton, Neville A. .
ERGONOMICS, 2016, 59 (11) :1442-1452