Prebiopsy Multiparametric MRI With Cancer-Negative Findings in Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer: Evaluation Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2

被引:5
作者
Kim, Jun Gon [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Chan Kyo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jae-Hun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 50 Ilwon Dong, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Ctr Imaging Sci, 50 Ilwon Dong, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Med Device Management & Res, SAIHST, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
biopsy; diagnosis; MRI; PI-RADS; prostate cancer; prostate multiparametric MRI; ULTRASOUND FUSION; TARGETED BIOPSY; OVERDIAGNOSIS; LOCALIZATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.17.18926
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to investigate the rates and characteristics of missed cancers at prebiopsy multiparametric MRI with cancer-negative findings according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 in men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 584 consecutive men (biopsy naive, n = 392; repeated biopsy, n = 192) with suspected PCa who underwent prebiopsy 3-T multiparametric MRI, followed by subsequent biopsies, were enrolled. Cancer-positive findings were confirmed at systemic biopsies and cognitive MRI-targeted biopsies, whereas cancer-negative findings were confirmed at systemic biopsies performed during subsequent follow-up. Missing and detection rates of all PCa and clinically significant cancer according to five biopsy-based definitions were determined. The likelihood of PCa at multiparametric MRI was evaluated according to PI-RADS version 2, and the results were compared. RESULTS. Pathologically confirmed cancers were found in 25% of patients. Cancer-positive MRI findings were seen in 99 men (17%) and, of these, 85.9% had PCa. Of 485 men with cancer-negative MRI findings, a total of 61 (12.6%) had PCa, including 46 men in the biopsynaive group and 15 men in the repeated-biopsy group. For clinically significant cancers, the rate of missed cancers at MRI was 0.1-6.0%, and the detection rate was 21.2-83.5%. For detecting PCa, multiparametric MRI had 96.8% specificity, 87.2% accuracy, and 87.4% negative predictive value. CONCLUSION. Prebiopsy 3-T multiparametric MRI with cancer-negative findings missed approximately 12.6% of cases of PCa, including 0.1-6.0% of clinically significant cancers in a cohort of biopsy-naive men and those who had undergone repeated biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 126
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Characterizing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    Hu, Yipeng
    Carter, Tim
    Arumainayagam, Nimalan
    Lecornet, Emilie
    Freeman, Alex
    Hawkes, David
    Barratt, Dean C.
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02) : 458 - 464
  • [2] Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Verma, Sadhna
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Shtern, Faina
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Margolis, Daniel
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Cornud, Francois
    Choyke, Peter L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [3] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [4] The Role of 3-Dimensional Mapping Biopsy in Decision Making for Treatment of Apparent Early Stage Prostate Cancer
    Barqawi, Al B.
    Rove, Kyle O.
    Gholizadeh, Saeed
    O'Donnell, Colin I.
    Koul, Hari
    Crawford, E. David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (01) : 80 - 85
  • [5] Scoring systems used for the interpretation and reporting of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection, localization, and characterization: could standardization lead to improved utilization of imaging within the diagnostic pathway?
    Dickinson, Louise
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Allen, Clare
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Carey, Brendan
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Heijmink, Stijn W.
    Hoskin, Peter
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Persad, Raj
    Puech, Philippe
    Punwani, Shonit
    Sohaib, Aslam
    Tombal, Bertrand
    Villers, Arnauld
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 37 (01) : 48 - 58
  • [6] Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Briganti, Alberto
    De Visschere, Pieter
    Emberton, Mark
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Kirkham, Alex
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Thoeny, Harriet
    Villeirs, Geert
    Villers, Arnauld
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (06) : 1045 - 1053
  • [7] Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection, Localization, and Staging
    Hoeks, Caroline M. A.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Yakar, Derya
    Somford, Diederik M.
    Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J.
    Scheenen, Tom W. J.
    Vos, Pieter C.
    Huisman, Henkjan
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Heerschap, Arend
    Fuetterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2011, 261 (01) : 46 - 66
  • [8] The Impact of PSA Screening on Prostate Cancer Mortality and Overdiagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the United States
    Howrey, Bret T.
    Kuo, Yong-Fang
    Lin, Yu-Li
    Goodwin, James S.
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 68 (01): : 56 - 61
  • [9] Prostate cancer in Asian men
    Ito, Kazuto
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2014, 11 (04) : 197 - 212
  • [10] Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment of Prostate Cancer
    Loeb, Stacy
    Bjurlin, Marc A.
    Nicholson, Joseph
    Tammela, Teuvo L.
    Penson, David F.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Carroll, Peter
    Etzioni, Ruth
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (06) : 1046 - 1055