The use of reference image criteria in X-ray diagnostics:: an application for the optimisation of lumbar spine radiographs

被引:27
作者
Almén, A [1 ]
Tingberg, A
Besjakov, J
Mattsson, S
机构
[1] Swedish Radiat Protect Author, SE-17116 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Phys, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[3] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, SE-20502 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
X-ray image; image quality; clinical study; diagnostic radiology;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-004-2320-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To ensure that sufficient image quality is obtained in diagnostic radiology, the image quality of clinical radiographs has to be evaluated. We present two methods herein for evaluating antero-posterior (AP) radiographs of the lumbar spine. One was using image criteria, including six anatomical details (absolute method). In the other, the visibility of anatomical details relative to a reference radiograph was evaluated (visual grading analysis). In total, 14 technique groups were evaluated. The technique groups differed in tube voltage and detector system characteristics. Six different gradients of the H&D curves were simulated. The visual grading analysis showed larger differences in image quality compared with the absolute method. The influence on the image quality due to a variation in tube voltage was easier to detect than the influence on the image quality from the detector characteristics. The visibility of the anatomical details was significantly dependent on the location in the spine. The visual grading analysis was found to be the preferable evaluation method in studies such as the present; however, it is necessary to guide and train the observer before the evaluation is performed.
引用
收藏
页码:1561 / 1567
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Almen A, 1996, ACTA RADIOL, V37, P337
  • [2] The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria
    Almén, A
    Tingberg, A
    Mattsson, S
    Besjakov, J
    Kheddache, S
    Lanhede, B
    Månsson, LG
    Zankl, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (875) : 1192 - 1199
  • [3] Erbium filtration: a cost-effective, dose-reducing filter which maintains abdominal image quality
    Doyle, CA
    Brennan, PC
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (09) : 1923 - 1925
  • [4] European Commission, 1996, 16260 EUR EUR COMM
  • [5] Image quality vs radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study
    Geijer, H
    Beckman, KW
    Andersson, T
    Persliden, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (09) : 1704 - 1709
  • [6] Report of an image quality and dose audit according to Directive 97/43/Euratom at Spanish private radiodiagnostics facilities
    González, L
    Vañó, E
    Oliete, S
    Manrique, J
    Hernáez, JM
    Lahuerta, J
    Ruiz, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 72 (854) : 186 - 192
  • [7] PATIENT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN 5 STANDARD X-RAY EXAMINATIONS
    HAVUKAINEN, R
    PIRINEN, M
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (03) : 813 - 817
  • [8] The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria
    Lanhede, B
    Båth, M
    Kheddache, S
    Sund, P
    Björneld, L
    Widell, M
    Almén, A
    Besjakov, J
    Mattsson, S
    Tingberg, A
    Herrmann, C
    Panzer, W
    Zankl, M
    Månsson, LG
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 75 (889) : 38 - 49
  • [9] Image quality for five modern chest radiography techniques:: a modified FROC study with an anthropomorphic chest phantom
    Månsson, LG
    Kheddache, S
    Lanhede, B
    Tylén, U
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (09) : 1826 - 1834
  • [10] Muhogora W E, 2001, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V2, P219, DOI 10.1120/1.1396421