Team science as interprofessional collaborative research practice: a systematic review of the science of team science literature

被引:48
|
作者
Little, Meg M. [1 ]
St Hill, Catherine A. [2 ]
Ware, Kenric B. [3 ]
Swanoski, Michael T. [1 ]
Chapman, Scott A. [2 ]
Lutfiyya, M. Nawal [4 ]
Cerra, Frank B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice & Pharmaceut Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Coll Pharm, Dept Expt & Clin Pharmacol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] South Univ, Dept Pharm Practice, Coll Pharm, Columbia, SC USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Natl Ctr Interprofess Educ & Practice, Childrens Rehabil Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Evidence-Based Medicine; Science; Research; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; EDUCATION; HEALTH; CARE;
D O I
10.1136/jim-2016-000216
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The National Institute of Health's concept of team science is a means of addressing complex clinical problems by applying conceptual and methodological approaches from multiple disciplines and health professions. The ultimate goal is the improved quality of care of patients with an emphasis on better population health outcomes. Collaborative research practice occurs when researchers from >1 health-related profession engage in scientific inquiry to jointly create and disseminate new knowledge to clinical and research health professionals in order to provide the highest quality of patient care to improve population health outcomes. Training of clinicians and researchers is necessary to produce clinically relevant evidence upon which to base patient care for disease management and empirically guided team-based patient care. In this study, we hypothesized that team science is an example of effective and impactful interprofessional collaborative research practice. To assess this hypothesis, we examined the contemporary literature on the science of team science (SciTS) produced in the past 10years (2005-2015) and related the SciTS to the overall field of interprofessional collaborative practice, of which collaborative research practice is a subset. A modified preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) approach was employed to analyze the SciTS literature in light of the general question: Is team science an example of interprofessional collaborative research practice? After completing a systematic review of the SciTS literature, the posed hypothesis was accepted, concluding that team science is a dimension of interprofessional collaborative practice.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 22
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using team science in vascularized composite allotransplantation to improve team and patient outcomes
    Griffin, Joan M.
    Kennedy, Cassie C.
    Boehmer, Kasey R.
    Hargraves, Ian G.
    Amer, Hatem
    Jowsey-Gregoire, Sheila G.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [32] CTS teams: a new model for translational team training and team science intervention
    McCormack, Wayne T.
    Strekalova, Yulia A. Levites
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [33] Team Science Approach to Developing Consensus on Research Good Practices for Practice-Based Research Networks: A Case Study
    Campbell-Voytal, Kimberly
    Daly, Jeanette M.
    Nagykaldi, Zsolt J.
    Aspy, Cheryl B.
    Dolor, Rowena J.
    Fagnan, Lyle J.
    Levy, Barcey T.
    Palac, Hannah L.
    Michaels, LeAnn
    Patterson, V. Beth
    Kano, Miria
    Smith, Paul D.
    Sussman, Andrew L.
    Williams, Robert
    Sterling, Pamela
    O'Beirne, Maeve
    Neale, Anne Victoria
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2015, 8 (06): : 632 - 637
  • [34] Citizen science for sustainable agriculture - A systematic literature review
    Ebitu, Larmbert
    Avery, Helen
    Mourad, Khaldoon A.
    Enyetu, Joshua
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 103
  • [35] Applying the lessons of implementation science to maximize feasibility and usability in team science intervention development
    Rolland, Betsy
    Resnik, Felice
    Hohl, Sarah D.
    Johnson, LaKaija J.
    Saha-Muldowney, Mondira
    Mahoney, Jane
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [36] Cancer and COVID-19 research studies with team science: a bibliometric study
    Ghamgosar, Arezoo
    Panahi, Sirous
    Nemati-Anaraki, Leila
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2023, 37 (04) : 568 - 575
  • [37] Expanding our perspectives on research in musculoskeletal science and practice
    Kerry, Roger
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2017, 32 : 114 - 119
  • [38] Transforming Environmental Engineering and Science Education, Research, and Practice
    Daigger, Glen T.
    Murthy, Sudhir
    Love, Nancy G.
    Sandino, Julian
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2017, 34 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [39] Science teacher identity research: a scoping literature review
    Zhai, Yanfang
    Tripp, Jennifer
    Liu, Xiufeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [40] The AGING Initiative experience: a call for sustained support for team science networks
    Garg, Tullika
    Anzuoni, Kathryn
    Landyn, Valentina
    Hajduk, Alexandra
    Waring, Stephen
    Hanson, Leah R.
    Whitson, Heather E.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16