College Student Samples Are Not Always Equivalent: The Magnitude of Personality Differences Across Colleges and Universities

被引:15
作者
Corker, Katherine S. [1 ]
Donnellan, M. Brent [2 ]
Kim, Su Yeong [3 ]
Schwartz, Seth J. [4 ]
Zamboanga, Byron L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Kenyon Coll, Gambier, OH 43022 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Univ Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[5] Smith Coll, Northampton, MA 01063 USA
关键词
IDENTITY; TRAITS; LIFE;
D O I
10.1111/jopy.12224
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research examined the magnitude of personality differences across different colleges and universities to understand (a) how much students at different colleges vary from one another and (b) whether there are site-level variables that can explain observed differences. Nearly 8,600 students at 30 colleges and universities completed a Big Five personality trait measure. Site-level information was obtained from the Integrated Postsecondary Education System database (U.S. Department of Education). Multilevel models revealed that each of the Big Five traits showed significant between-site variability, even after accounting for individual-level demographic differences. Some site-level variables (e.g., enrollment size, requiring letters of recommendation) explained between-site differences in traits, but many tests were not statistically significant. Student samples at different universities differed in terms of average levels of Big Five personality domains. This raises the possibility that personality differences may explain differences in research results obtained when studying students at different colleges and universities. Furthermore, results suggest that research that compares findings for only a few sites (e.g., much cross-cultural research) runs the risk of overgeneralizing differences between specific samples to broader group differences. These results underscore the value of multisite collaborative research efforts to enhance psychological research.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 135
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, R PACKAGE VERSION 31
[2]   Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology [J].
Asendorpf, Jens B. ;
Conner, Mark ;
De Fruyt, Filip ;
De Houwer, Jan ;
Denissen, Jaap J. A. ;
Fiedler, Klaus ;
Fiedler, Susann ;
Funder, David C. ;
Kliegl, Reinhold ;
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Perugini, Marco ;
Roberts, Brent W. ;
Schmitt, Manfred ;
vanAken, Marcel A. G. ;
Weber, Hannelore ;
Wicherts, Jelte M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2013, 27 (02) :108-119
[3]   Introduction to the Special Issue on College Student Mental Health [J].
Castillo, Linda G. ;
Schwartz, Seth J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 69 (04) :291-297
[4]   What Happens If We Compare Chopsticks With Forks? The Impact of Making Inappropriate Comparisons in Cross-Cultural Research [J].
Chen, Fang Fang .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 95 (05) :1005-1018
[5]   Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance [J].
Cheung, GW ;
Rensvold, RB .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 9 (02) :233-255
[6]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[7]   The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores [J].
Cortina, JM ;
Goldstein, NB ;
Payne, SC ;
Davison, HK ;
Gilliland, SW .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 53 (02) :325-351
[8]   The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality [J].
Donnellan, M. Brent ;
Oswald, Frederick L. ;
Baird, Brendan M. ;
Lucas, Richard E. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2006, 18 (02) :192-203
[9]  
Ebersole C. R., J EXPT SOCI IN PRESS
[10]   Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results [J].
Fabrigar, Leandre R. ;
Wegener, Duane T. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 66 :68-80