Reliability of Waveform Analysis as an Adjunct to Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks

被引:32
|
作者
Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee [1 ]
Arnuntasupakul, Vanlapa [1 ]
De La Garza, Daniel Chora [1 ]
Vijitpavan, Amorn [2 ]
Ah-Kye, Sonia [1 ]
Saelao, Abhidej [2 ]
Tiyaprasertkul, Worakamol [3 ]
Finlayson, Roderick J. [1 ]
Tran, De Q. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Montreal Gen Hosp, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Mahidol Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Ramathibodi Hosp, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
[3] Chiang Mai Univ, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Chiang Mai 50000, Thailand
关键词
FLAVUM MIDLINE GAPS; ANALGESIA; CONFIRMATION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1097/AAP.0000000000000313
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The epidural space is most commonly identified with loss of resistance (LOR). Although sensitive, LOR lacks specificity, as cysts in interspinous ligaments, gaps in ligamentum flavum, paravertebral muscles, thoracic paravertebral spaces, and intermuscular planes can yield nonepidural LOR. Epidural waveform analysis (EWA) provides a simple confirmatory adjunct for LOR. When the needle is correctly positioned inside the epidural space, measurement of the pressure at its tip results in a pulsatile waveform. In this observational study, we set out to assess the sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values of EWA for thoracic epidural blocks. Methods: We enrolled a convenience sample of 160 patients undergoing thoracic epidural blocks for thoracic surgery, abdominal surgery, or rib fractures. The choice of patient position (sitting or lateral decubitus), approach (midline or paramedian), and LOR medium (air or normal saline) was left to the operator (attending anesthesiologist, fellow, or resident). After obtaining a satisfactory LOR, the operator injected 5 mL of normal saline through the epidural needle. A sterile tubing, connected to a pressure transducer, was attached to the needle to measure the pressure at the needle tip. A 4-mL bolus of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 5 mu g/mL was then administered and, after 10 minutes, the patient was assessed for sensory blockade to ice. Results: The failure rate (incorrect identification of the epidural space with LOR) was 23.1%. Of these 37 failed epidural blocks, 27 provided no sensory anesthesia at 10 minutes. In 10 subjects, the operator was unable to thread the catheter through the needle. When compared with the ice test, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of EWA were 91.1%, 83.8%, 94.9%, and 73.8%, respectively. Conclusions: Epidural waveform analysis (with pressure transduction through the needle) provides a simple adjunct to LOR for thoracic epidural blocks. Although its use was devoid of complications, further confirmatory studies are required before its routine implementation in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 697
页数:4
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] A Randomized Comparison Between Conventional and Waveform-Confirmed Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks
    Arnuntasupakul, Vanlapa
    Van Zundert, Tom C. R. V.
    Vijitpavan, Amorn
    Aliste, Julian
    Engsusophon, Phatthanaphol
    Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee
    Ah-Kye, Sonia
    Finlayson, Roderick J.
    Tran, De Q. H.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (03) : 368 - 373
  • [2] Reliability of pressure waveform analysis to determine correct epidural needle placement in labouring women
    Al-Aamri, I.
    Derzi, S. H.
    Moore, A.
    Elgueta, M. F.
    Moustafa, M.
    Schricker, T.
    Tran, D. Q.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 (07) : 840 - 844
  • [3] A randomized comparison of loss of resistance versus loss of resistance plus electrical stimulation: effect on success of thoracic epidural placement
    Dobson, Sean Wayne
    Weller, Robert Stephen
    Edwards, Christopher
    Turner, James David
    Jaffe, Jonathan Douglas
    Reynolds, Jon Wellington
    Henshaw, Daryl Steven
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [4] A randomized comparison of loss of resistance versus loss of resistance plus electrical stimulation: effect on success of thoracic epidural placement
    Sean Wayne Dobson
    Robert Stephen Weller
    Christopher Edwards
    James David Turner
    Jonathan Douglas Jaffe
    Jon Wellington Reynolds
    Daryl Steven Henshaw
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [5] Con: Thoracic Epidural Block Is Not Superior to Paravertebral Blocks for Open Thoracic Surgery
    Krakowski, James C.
    Arora, Harendra
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (06) : 1720 - 1722
  • [6] Pro: Thoracic Epidural Block Is Superior to Paravertebral Blocks for Open Thoracic Surgery
    Teeter, Emily G.
    Kumar, Priya A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (06) : 1717 - 1719
  • [7] Pressure waveform-guided epidural catheter placement in comparison to the loss-of-resistance conventional method
    Gong, Yuhua
    Shi, Haixia
    Wu, Jie
    Labu, Danbaila
    Sun, Junzhi
    Zhong, Haiyan
    Li, Libiao
    Xin, Xuedong
    Wang, Ling
    Wu, Lifang
    Ma, Daqing
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2014, 26 (05) : 395 - 401
  • [8] Sensitivity and specificity of waveform analysis for assessing postoperative epidural function
    Chauvin, Carl
    Klar, Gregory
    Hopman, Wilma M.
    da Silva, Leopoldo Muniz
    Day, Andrew G.
    Phelan, Rachel
    McMullen, Michael
    Chen, Kai
    Lima, Rodrigo Moreira E.
    Mizubuti, Glenio B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2022, 77
  • [9] A pulsatile pressure waveform is a sensitive marker for confirming the location of the thoracic epidural space
    Lennox, Pamela H.
    Umedaly, Hamed S.
    Grant, Raymer P.
    White, S. Adrian
    Fitzmaurice, Brett G.
    Evans, Kenneth G.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2006, 20 (05) : 659 - 663
  • [10] Loss-of-Resistance Versus Dynamic Pressure-Sensing Technology for Successful Placement of Thoracic Epidural Catheters: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Ranganath, Yatish S.
    Ramanujam, Vendhan
    Al-Hassan, Qasim
    Sibenaller, Zita
    Seering, Melinda S.
    Singh, Tejinder Singh Swaran
    Punia, Sangini
    Parra, Michelle C.
    Wong, Cynthia A.
    Sondekoppam, Rakesh V.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 139 (01) : 201 - 210