MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument

被引:4
作者
Kasper, Jurgen [1 ,2 ]
Luehnen, Julia [3 ]
Hinneburg, Jana [3 ]
Siebenhofer, Andrea [4 ,5 ]
Posch, Nicole [4 ]
Berger-Hoeger, Birte [3 ]
Grafe, Alexander [6 ]
Keppler, Jan [7 ]
Steckelberg, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tromso, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth & Caring Sci, Tromso, Norway
[2] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway
[3] Martin Luther Univ Hate Wittenberg, Hlth & Nursing Sci, Halle, Germany
[4] Med Univ Graz, Inst Gen Practice & Evidence Based Hlth Serv Res, Graz, Austria
[5] Goethe Univ, Inst Gen Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Inst Psychol, Kiel, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 11期
关键词
information management; health & safety; information technology; PATIENT; BROCHURES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040572
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Health information is a prerequisite of informed decision-making. Criteria for development, content and presentation have recently been published in a corresponding guideline. Within a systematic search, 27 relevant checklists were identified, none of them, however, complying with the guideline or providing reasonably operationalised measurement items. Therefore, a draft of a checklist with 19 criteria was drafted. The current study aims at developing and validating this measure of quality. Methods and analysis The validation design consists of five single studies to be conducted at the University of Halle-Wittenberg/Germany and Graz/Austria. (1) Achieving content validity through expert reviews of the first draft, (2) achieving feasibility using 'think aloud' in piloting with untrained users, (3) pretesting the instrument applied to health information materials without use of secondary sources: determining inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, (4) determining construct validity using information on proceedings and methods in the development process provided by the developers and (5) determining divergent validity in comparison with the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQUIP) (expanded) Scale. The substudies will use varying samples of experts, students and developers and will apply the instrument to materials of various domains. Sample sizes will be adjusted to the particular research designs and questions. Analyses will employ qualitative methods, such as content analyses and discourse within the expert panel, and correlation-based methods both for determining inter-rater reliability and validity. Ethics and dissemination The project is approved by the ethics committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval number: 2019 115). Results will be published, and the instrument made accessible on public health platforms. It is meant to become a certification standard. MAPPinfo can be used as a screening instrument without training or secondary sources. Although developed in the German language, the instrument will be applicable also in other languages. Protocol version July 2020.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Study monitoring: a useful tool for quality health research
    Arias Valencia, Samuel Andres
    Hernandez Pinzon, Giovanna
    REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 25 (05): : 462 - 468
  • [42] ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION MANAGAMENT IN BASIC HEALTH CARE: a study in Family Health Units
    Pinheiro dos Santos, Beatriz Rosa
    Martins Damian, Ieda Pelogia
    INFORMACAO & SOCIEDADE-ESTUDOS, 2019, 29 (03) : 171 - 194
  • [43] Assessment of sedation level for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography - a prospective validation study
    Jokelainen, Jarno
    Mustonen, Harri
    Kylanpaa, Leena
    Udd, Marianne
    Lindstrom, Outi
    Poyhia, Reino
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 53 (03) : 370 - 375
  • [44] Validation study of the European Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)
    Martins, Sonia
    Loureno, Carla
    Pinto-de-Sousa, Joao
    Conceicao, Filipe
    Paiva, Jose Artur
    Simoes, Mario R.
    Fernandes, Lia
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2015, 27 (05) : 777 - 784
  • [45] The effect of nocturnal wear of complete dentures on sleep and oral health related quality of life: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Emami, Elham
    Phan The Huy Nguyen
    Almeida, Fernanda R.
    Feine, Jocelyne S.
    Karp, Igor
    Lavigne, Gilles
    Nelly Huynh
    TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [46] Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research
    Armijo-Olivo, Susan
    Stiles, Carla R.
    Hagen, Neil A.
    Biondo, Patricia D.
    Cummings, Greta G.
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [47] The Extent and Coverage of Current Knowledge of Connected Health: Systematic Mapping Study
    Karampela, Maria
    Isomursu, Minna
    Porat, Talya
    Maramis, Christos
    Mountford, Nicola
    Giunti, Guido
    Chouvarda, Ioanna
    Lehocki, Fedor
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (09)
  • [48] Experiences, practices and barriers to accessing health information: A qualitative study
    Scantlebury, Arabella
    Booth, Alison
    Hanley, Bec
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2017, 103 : 103 - 108
  • [49] The impact of humanising hospital care on health outcomes: an observational study protocol
    Allande-Cusso, Regina
    Mejias-Martin, Yolanda-Angustias
    Quinoz-Gallardo, Maria-Dolores
    Porcel-Galvez, Ana-Maria
    BMC NURSING, 2025, 24 (01):
  • [50] Work stress and oral health-related quality of life among Indian information technology workers: an exploratory study
    Acharya, Shashidhar
    Pentapati, Kalyana C.
    INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 2012, 62 (03) : 132 - 136