MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument

被引:4
作者
Kasper, Jurgen [1 ,2 ]
Luehnen, Julia [3 ]
Hinneburg, Jana [3 ]
Siebenhofer, Andrea [4 ,5 ]
Posch, Nicole [4 ]
Berger-Hoeger, Birte [3 ]
Grafe, Alexander [6 ]
Keppler, Jan [7 ]
Steckelberg, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tromso, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth & Caring Sci, Tromso, Norway
[2] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway
[3] Martin Luther Univ Hate Wittenberg, Hlth & Nursing Sci, Halle, Germany
[4] Med Univ Graz, Inst Gen Practice & Evidence Based Hlth Serv Res, Graz, Austria
[5] Goethe Univ, Inst Gen Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Inst Psychol, Kiel, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 11期
关键词
information management; health & safety; information technology; PATIENT; BROCHURES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040572
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Health information is a prerequisite of informed decision-making. Criteria for development, content and presentation have recently been published in a corresponding guideline. Within a systematic search, 27 relevant checklists were identified, none of them, however, complying with the guideline or providing reasonably operationalised measurement items. Therefore, a draft of a checklist with 19 criteria was drafted. The current study aims at developing and validating this measure of quality. Methods and analysis The validation design consists of five single studies to be conducted at the University of Halle-Wittenberg/Germany and Graz/Austria. (1) Achieving content validity through expert reviews of the first draft, (2) achieving feasibility using 'think aloud' in piloting with untrained users, (3) pretesting the instrument applied to health information materials without use of secondary sources: determining inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, (4) determining construct validity using information on proceedings and methods in the development process provided by the developers and (5) determining divergent validity in comparison with the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQUIP) (expanded) Scale. The substudies will use varying samples of experts, students and developers and will apply the instrument to materials of various domains. Sample sizes will be adjusted to the particular research designs and questions. Analyses will employ qualitative methods, such as content analyses and discourse within the expert panel, and correlation-based methods both for determining inter-rater reliability and validity. Ethics and dissemination The project is approved by the ethics committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval number: 2019 115). Results will be published, and the instrument made accessible on public health platforms. It is meant to become a certification standard. MAPPinfo can be used as a screening instrument without training or secondary sources. Although developed in the German language, the instrument will be applicable also in other languages. Protocol version July 2020.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and validation of a pragmatic measure of cocreation in research engagement: a study protocol
    Jolles, Monica Perez
    Willging, Cathleen
    Tufte, Janice
    Ostendorf, Danielle
    Kwan, Bethany M.
    Sevick, Carter
    Holliman, Brooke Dorsey
    Weiner, Bryan J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [22] Gender Equality in Information Technology Processes: A Systematic Mapping Study
    Paton-Romero, J. David
    Block, Sunniva
    Ayala, Claudia
    Jaccheri, Letizia
    ADVANCES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION, FICC, VOL 2, 2023, 652 : 310 - 327
  • [23] Compliance with the Health Information and Quality Authority of Ireland National Standard for Patient Discharge Summary Information: a retrospective study in secondary care
    Aziz, Claudine
    Grimes, Tamasine
    Deasy, Evelyn
    Roche, Cicely
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2016, 23 (05) : 272 - 277
  • [24] How Cities Study Quality of Life and Use This Information: Results of an Empirical Study
    Ligarski, Mariusz J.
    Owczarek, Tomasz
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [25] Validation and reliability of the Abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) in the hospitalized trauma population
    Kruithof, N.
    Haagsma, J. A.
    Karabatzakis, M.
    Cnossen, M. C.
    de Munter, L.
    van de Ree, C. L. P.
    de Jongh, M. A. C.
    Polinder, S.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2018, 49 (10): : 1796 - 1804
  • [26] Validation study of the pediatric allergic rhinitis quality of life questionnarie
    Mavroudi, Antigoni
    Chrysochoou, Elisavet-Anna
    Boyle, Robert J.
    Papastergiopoulos, Antonis
    Karantaglis, Nikolaos
    Karagiannidou, Agathi
    Xinias, Loannis
    Farmaki, Evangelia
    Hatziagorou, Elpis
    Kirvassilis, Fotios
    Kourentas, Grigorios
    Tsanakas, John
    Warner, John O.
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 34 (02) : 159 - 165
  • [27] Improving chemotherapy processes with a protocol-based information system: A pre and post-implementation study
    Pirnejad, Habibollah
    Gao, Chen
    Reddingius, Roel
    Rijneveld, Anita
    Bal, Roland
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2013, 82 (04) : 220 - 229
  • [28] Safety and Cybersecurity Assessment Techniques for Critical Industries: A Mapping Study
    Babeshko, Ievgen
    Di Giandomenico, Felicita
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 83781 - 83793
  • [29] Study protocol: longitudinal study of the transition of young people with complex health needs from child to adult health services
    Colver, Allan F.
    Merrick, Hannah
    Deverill, Mark
    Le Couteur, Ann
    Parr, Jeremy
    Pearce, Mark S.
    Rapley, Tim
    Vale, Luke
    Watson, Rose
    McConachie, Helen
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [30] THE REAL QUALITY OF MATERNITY CARE IN IRAN HOSPITALS: A QUALITY ASSESSMENT STUDY
    Azarabadie, Samira
    Aghlmand, Siamak
    IIOAB JOURNAL, 2016, 7 : 611 - 617