MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument

被引:4
作者
Kasper, Jurgen [1 ,2 ]
Luehnen, Julia [3 ]
Hinneburg, Jana [3 ]
Siebenhofer, Andrea [4 ,5 ]
Posch, Nicole [4 ]
Berger-Hoeger, Birte [3 ]
Grafe, Alexander [6 ]
Keppler, Jan [7 ]
Steckelberg, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tromso, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth & Caring Sci, Tromso, Norway
[2] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway
[3] Martin Luther Univ Hate Wittenberg, Hlth & Nursing Sci, Halle, Germany
[4] Med Univ Graz, Inst Gen Practice & Evidence Based Hlth Serv Res, Graz, Austria
[5] Goethe Univ, Inst Gen Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Christian Albrechts Univ Kiel, Inst Psychol, Kiel, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 11期
关键词
information management; health & safety; information technology; PATIENT; BROCHURES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040572
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Health information is a prerequisite of informed decision-making. Criteria for development, content and presentation have recently been published in a corresponding guideline. Within a systematic search, 27 relevant checklists were identified, none of them, however, complying with the guideline or providing reasonably operationalised measurement items. Therefore, a draft of a checklist with 19 criteria was drafted. The current study aims at developing and validating this measure of quality. Methods and analysis The validation design consists of five single studies to be conducted at the University of Halle-Wittenberg/Germany and Graz/Austria. (1) Achieving content validity through expert reviews of the first draft, (2) achieving feasibility using 'think aloud' in piloting with untrained users, (3) pretesting the instrument applied to health information materials without use of secondary sources: determining inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, (4) determining construct validity using information on proceedings and methods in the development process provided by the developers and (5) determining divergent validity in comparison with the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQUIP) (expanded) Scale. The substudies will use varying samples of experts, students and developers and will apply the instrument to materials of various domains. Sample sizes will be adjusted to the particular research designs and questions. Analyses will employ qualitative methods, such as content analyses and discourse within the expert panel, and correlation-based methods both for determining inter-rater reliability and validity. Ethics and dissemination The project is approved by the ethics committee of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (approval number: 2019 115). Results will be published, and the instrument made accessible on public health platforms. It is meant to become a certification standard. MAPPinfo can be used as a screening instrument without training or secondary sources. Although developed in the German language, the instrument will be applicable also in other languages. Protocol version July 2020.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical information quality of digital health technologies: protocol for an international eDelphi study
    Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip
    Wark, Petra A.
    Mastellos, Nikolaos
    Gallagher, Joseph
    Majeed, Azeem
    Car, Josip
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [2] Ensuring Quality Information for Patients: development and preliminary validation of a new instrument to improve the quality of written health care information
    Moult, B
    Franck, LS
    Brady, H
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2004, 7 (02) : 165 - 175
  • [3] Information technology capacities assessment tool in hospitals: Instrument development and validation
    Jaana, Mirou
    Pare, Guy
    Sicotte, Claude
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 (01) : 97 - 106
  • [4] Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Arabic Health Information on Halitosis: Infodemiological Study
    Aboalshamat, Khalid
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [5] Psychometric properties of the revised quality of nursing diagnosis, interventions, and outcomes instrument: A validation study
    Bozzetti, Mattia
    Marcomini, Ilaria
    Parma, Maddalena
    Dordoni, Elisa
    Magna, Elisa
    Staub, Maria Muller
    Pendoni, Roberta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING KNOWLEDGE, 2024,
  • [6] Development of a Quality Management Model and Self-assessment Questionnaire for Hybrid Health Care: Concept Mapping Study
    Tossaint-Schoenmakers, Rosian
    Kasteleyn, Marise J.
    Rauwerdink, Anneloek
    Chavannes, Niels
    Willems, Sofie
    Talboom-Kamp, Esther P. W. A.
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (07)
  • [7] Organizational information mapping: a study at Embrapa
    Dutra Moresi, Eduardo Amadeu
    Cordeiro Ramos, Rosana Guedes
    do Prado, Hercules Antonio
    TRANSINFORMACAO, 2010, 22 (02): : 101 - 110
  • [8] Effect of a nursing information system on the quality of information processing in nursing: An evaluation study using the HIS-monitor instrument
    Ammenwerth, Elske
    Rauchegger, Franz
    Ehlers, Frauke
    Hirsch, Bernhard
    Schaubmayr, Christine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2011, 80 (01) : 25 - 38
  • [9] Validation of the QualiPresc instrument for assessing the quality of drug prescription writing in primary health care
    Batista, Almaria Mariz
    da Silva Gama, Zenewton Andre
    Souza, Dyego
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (05):
  • [10] An Overview of Electronic Health Information Management Systems Quality Assessment
    Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley
    Mair, Frances S.
    Tao, Cui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MANAGING INTEROPERABILITY AND COMPLEXITY IN HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2012, : 37 - 46