Is Project Towards No Drug Abuse (Project TND) an Evidence-Based Drug and Violence Prevention Program? A Review and Reappraisal of the Evaluation Studies

被引:9
作者
Gorman, Dennis M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Drug abuse; Alcohol abuse; Smoking; Prevention; Violence prevention; Evidence-based practice; Prevention science; SKILLS TRAINING-PROGRAM; ONE-YEAR OUTCOMES; TRIAL; SCHOOLS; CURRICULUM; FIDELITY; CRITIQUE; SMOKING; POLICY; PATH;
D O I
10.1007/s10935-014-0348-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This paper critically reviews the published evidence pertaining to Project Towards No Drug Abuse (Project TND). Publications from seven evaluation studies of Project TND are reviewed, and the results from these are discussed as related to the following outcomes: main effects on the use of cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana; main effects on the use of "hard drugs," defined in the evaluations as cocaine, hallucinogens, stimulants, inhalants, ecstasy and other drugs (e.g., depressants, PCP, steroids and heroin); subgroup and interaction analyses of drug use; and violence-related behaviors. Very few main effects have been found for cigarette, alcohol and marijuana use in the Project TND evaluations. While studies do report main effects for hard drug use, these findings are subject to numerous threats to validity and may be attributable to the data analyses employed. Similarly, while isolated subgroup and interaction effects were found for alcohol use among baseline nonusers and some violence-related behaviors in the early Project TND evaluations, these findings have not been replicated in more recent studies and may result from multiple comparisons between study conditions. In conclusion, there is little evidence to support the assertion that Project TND is an effective drug or violence prevention program. The broader implications of these findings for prevention science are discussed and suggestions are made as to how the quality of research in the field might be improved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 232
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, SOCIAL POLICY REPORT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, STAND EV CRIT EFF EF
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1963, CONJECTURES REFUTAT
[4]   White hat bias: the need for authors to have the spin stop with them [J].
Atkinson, R. L. ;
Macdonald, I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2010, 34 (01) :83-83
[5]   Boosting a Teen Substance Use Prevention Program with Motivational Interviewing [J].
Barnett, Elizabeth ;
Spruijt-Metz, Donna ;
Unger, Jennifer B. ;
Sun, Ping ;
Rohrbach, Louise Ann ;
Sussman, Steve .
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2012, 47 (04) :418-428
[6]   EDITORIAL: The Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project: A Lesson on Inaccurate Media Coverage and the Importance of Prevention Advocacy [J].
Gilbert J. Botvin ;
Steve Sussman ;
Anthony Biglan .
Prevention Science, 2001, 2 (2) :67-70
[7]   Youth, drugs and resilience education [J].
Brown, JH .
JOURNAL OF DRUG EDUCATION, 2001, 31 (01) :83-122
[8]   White hat bias: examples of its presence in obesity research and a call for renewed commitment to faithfulness in research reporting [J].
Cope, M. B. ;
Allison, D. B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2010, 34 (01) :84-88
[9]   Project towards no drug abuse: Generalizability to a general high school sample [J].
Dent, CW ;
Sussman, S ;
Stacy, AW .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 32 (06) :514-520
[10]   DRUG PREVENTION IN JUNIOR-HIGH - A MULTISITE LONGITUDINAL TEST [J].
ELLICKSON, PL ;
BELL, RM .
SCIENCE, 1990, 247 (4948) :1299-1305