A probabilistic risk-based decision framework for structural health monitoring

被引:40
作者
Hughes, A. J. [1 ]
Barthorpe, R. J. [1 ]
Dervilis, N. [1 ]
Farrar, C. R. [2 ]
Worden, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Mech Engn, Dynam Res Grp, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Engn Inst, MS T-001, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Structural health monitoring; Probabilistic risk assessment; Probabilistic graphical models; Decision-making; BAYESIAN-APPROACH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107339
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Obtaining the ability to make informed decisions regarding the operation and maintenance of structures, provides a major incentive for the implementation of structural health monitoring (SHM) systems. Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is an established methodology that allows engineers to make risk-informed decisions regarding the design and operation of safety-critical and high-value assets in industries such as nuclear and aerospace. The current paper aims to formulate a risk-based decision framework for structural health monitoring that combines elements of PRA with the existing SHM paradigm. As an apt tool for reasoning and decision-making under uncertainty, probabilistic graphical models serve as the foundation of the framework. The framework involves modelling failure modes of structures as Bayesian network representations of fault trees and then assigning costs or utilities to the failure events. The fault trees allow for information to pass from probabilistic classifiers to influence diagram representations of decision processes whilst also providing nodes within the graphical model that may be queried to obtain marginal probability distributions over local damage states within a structure. Optimal courses of action for structures are selected by determining the strategies that maximise expected utility. The risk-based framework is demonstrated on a realistic truss-like structure and supported by experimental data. Finally, a discussion of the risk-based approach is made and further challenges pertaining to decision-making processes in the context of SHM are identified. (c) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Barthorpe R., 2011, THESIS
[2]  
Bedford T., 2001, Probabilistic risk analysis: Foundations and methods
[3]  
Bishop C. M, 2007, Pattern recognition and machine learning, V5th, DOI [DOI 10.18637/JSS.V017.B05, 10.1117/1.2819119]
[4]   Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks [J].
Bobbio, A ;
Portinale, L ;
Minichino, M ;
Ciancamerla, E .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 71 (03) :249-260
[5]  
Bull L.A., MECH SYSTEMS SIGNAL, V134
[6]   Dynamic Bayesian Network for Aircraft Wing Health Monitoring Digital Twin [J].
Li, Chenzhao ;
Mahadevan, Sankaran ;
Ling, You ;
Choze, Sergio ;
Wang, Liping .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2017, 55 (03) :930-941
[7]  
Farrar C, 2013, Structural health monitoring a machine learning perspective
[8]   A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing [J].
Flynn, Eric B. ;
Todd, Michael D. .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, 24 (04) :891-903
[9]  
Fragola JR, 1996, AIP CONF PROC, P719
[10]   A recursive Bayesian approach for fatigue damage prognosis: An experimental validation at the reliability component level [J].
Gobbato, Maurizio ;
Kosmatka, John B. ;
Conte, Joel P. .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2014, 45 (02) :448-467