Everolimus in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Raphael, Jacques [1 ]
Lefebvre, Cory [2 ]
Allan, Alison [2 ]
Helou, Joelle [3 ]
Boldt, Gabriel [1 ]
Vandenberg, Theodore [1 ]
Blanchette, Phillip S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Oncol, Div Med Oncol, London Reg Canc Program, 800 Commissioners Rd East, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
PHASE-II TRIAL; PLUS EXEMESTANE; PI3K/AKT/MTOR PATHWAY; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; DOUBLE-BLIND; COMBINATION; SURVIVAL; WOMEN; PROGRESSION; PACLITAXEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11523-020-00770-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Everolimus plus exemestane is approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. The role of everolimus is less well defined in other breast cancer phenotypes and in combination with other drugs. Objectives We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of adding everolimus to standard of care (SoC) in MBC regardless of tumor phenotype and treatment type. Methods The electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE were searched for eligible randomized trials. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and pooled risk ratios (RR) and odds ratios for objective response rates, disease control rate (DCR), and grade 3 or higher toxicity were meta-analyzed. Subgroup analyses compared survival outcomes by tumor phenotype. Results Data from 2826 patients from eight trials were analyzed. The addition of everolimus to SoC reduced the risk of disease progression by 29% (HR 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.90). This did not translate into an OS benefit (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.80-1.13). In addition, everolimus improved the DCR (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68-0.98), whereas it increased the risk of developing grade 3 or higher toxicity. The PFS benefit was more prominent for patients with hormone receptor-positive (+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (-) disease. For the HER2 (+) subgroup, the PFS benefit was restricted to patients with hormone receptor (-) disease. Conclusions Everolimus reduces the risk of disease progression in hormone receptor (+) MBC. In patients with HER2 (+) disease, the benefit is limited for those with hormone receptor (-) disease. Given the approval and use of newer drugs in MBC, clinical trials and real-world data are needed to confirm the benefit of everolimus and define the best treatment sequence strategy to adopt in that setting.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 732
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Everolimus in advanced breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Raphael, J.
    Lefebvre, C.
    Allan, A.
    Helou, J.
    Boldt, G.
    Vandenberg, T.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [2] Everolimus in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Jacques Raphael
    Cory Lefebvre
    Alison Allan
    Joelle Helou
    Gabriel Boldt
    Theodore Vandenberg
    Phillip S Blanchette
    Targeted Oncology, 2020, 15 : 723 - 732
  • [3] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF EVEROLIMUS IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC BREAST CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Hyderboini, R. K.
    Thode, R.
    Malode, M.
    Pinigani, V
    Nathani, J.
    Veeranki, P.
    Paladugu, G.
    Nadimpally, J.
    Kumar, N.
    Palakurthy, P.
    Vsn, M.
    Dang, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S15 - S15
  • [4] HPV AND BREAST CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Karachalios, Charalampos
    Petousis, Stamatios
    Margioula-Siarkou, Chrysoula
    Dinas, Konstantinos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A218 - A218
  • [5] IVF and breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sergentanis, Theodoros N.
    Diamantaras, Andreas-Antonios
    Perlepe, Christina
    Kanavidis, Prodromos
    Skalkidou, Alkistis
    Petridou, Eleni Th.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2014, 20 (01) : 106 - 123
  • [6] Psychoeducation for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Setyowibowo, Hari
    Yudiana, Whisnu
    Hunfeld, Joke A. M.
    Iskandarsyah, Aulia
    Passchier, Jan
    Arzomand, Homra
    Sadarjoen, Sawitri S.
    de Vries, Ralph
    Sijbrandij, Marit
    BREAST, 2022, 62 : 36 - 51
  • [7] Pilates for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Espindula, Roberta Costa
    Nadas, Gabriella Barbosa
    da Rosa, Maria Ines
    Foster, Charlie
    de Araujo, Florentino Cardoso
    Grande, Antonio Jose
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2017, 63 (11): : 1006 - 1011
  • [8] A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the risk of pulmonary toxicities in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with everolimus.
    Swarup, Sriman
    Thein, Kyaw Zin
    Sultan, Anita
    Yendala, Rachana
    Hardwicke, Fred L.
    Jones, Catherine
    Awasthi, Sanjay
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [9] Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wagner, A. D.
    Grothe, W.
    Haerting, J.
    Kleber, G.
    Grothey, A.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 210 - 210
  • [10] Cisplatin or Not in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Petrelli, Fausto
    Zaniboni, Alberto
    Coinu, Andrea
    Cabiddu, Mary
    Ghilardi, Mara
    Sgroi, Giovanni
    Barni, Sandro
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):