Particle size distribution of exosomes and microvesicles determined by transmission electron microscopy, flow cytometry, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and resistive pulse sensing

被引:662
作者
van der Pol, E. [1 ,2 ]
Coumans, F. A. W. [1 ,2 ]
Grootemaat, A. E. [1 ]
Gardiner, C. [3 ]
Sargent, I. L. [3 ]
Harrison, P. [4 ]
Sturk, A. [1 ]
van Leeuwen, T. G. [2 ]
Nieuwland, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Lab Expt Clin Chem, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] John Radcliffe Hosp, Nuffield Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Sch Med, Sch Immun & Infect, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
cell-derived microparticles; exosomes; optical devices; reference standards; secretory vesicles; REFRACTIVE-INDEX; MICROPARTICLES;
D O I
10.1111/jth.12602
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Enumeration of extracellular vesicles has clinical potential as a biomarker for disease. In biological samples, the smallest and largest vesicles typically differ 25-fold in size, 300 000-fold in concentration, 20 000-fold in volume, and 10 000 000-fold in scattered light. Because of this heterogeneity, the currently employed techniques detect concentrations ranging from 10 4 to 10 12 vesicles mL(-1). Objectives: To investigate whether the large variation in the detected concentration of vesicles is caused by the minimum detectable vesicle size of five widely used techniques. Methods: The size and concentration of vesicles and reference beads were measured with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), a conventional flow cytometer, a flow cytometer dedicated to detecting submicrometer particles, nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), and resistive pulse sensing (RPS). Results: Each technique gave a different size distribution and a different concentration for the same vesicle sample. Conclusion: Differences between the detected vesicle concentrations are primarily caused by differences between the minimum detectable vesicle sizes. The minimum detectable vesicle sizes were 70-90 nm for NTA, 70-100 nm for RPS, 150-190 nm for dedicated flow cytometry, and 270-600 nm for conventional flow cytometry. TEM could detect the smallest vesicles present, albeit after adhesion on a surface. Dedicated flow cytometry was most accurate in determining the size of reference beads, but is expected to be less accurate on vesicles, owing to heterogeneity of the refractive index of vesicles. Nevertheless, dedicated flow cytometry is relatively fast and allows multiplex fluorescence detection, making it most applicable to clinical research.
引用
收藏
页码:1182 / 1192
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PLATELETS
  • [2] Cell-derived vesicles exposing coagulant tissue factor in saliva
    Berckmans, Rene J.
    Sturk, Auguste
    van Tienen, Laurens M.
    Schaap, Marianne C. L.
    Nieuwland, Rienk
    [J]. BLOOD, 2011, 117 (11) : 3172 - 3180
  • [3] The spatial variation of the refractive index in biological cells
    Beuthan, J
    Minet, O
    Helfmann, J
    Herrig, M
    Muller, G
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (03) : 369 - 382
  • [4] Bohren C.F, 2008, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles
  • [5] Characterization and Comprehensive Proteome Profiling of Exosomes Secreted by Hepatocytes
    Conde-Vancells, Javier
    Rodriguez-Suarez, Eva
    Embade, Nieves
    Gil, David
    Matthiesen, Rune
    Valle, Mikel
    Elortza, Felix
    Lu, Shelly C.
    Mato, Jose M.
    Falcon-Perez, Juan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2008, 7 (12) : 5157 - 5166
  • [6] de Vrij J, 2013, NANOMEDICINE, P1
  • [7] Sizing and phenotyping of cellular vesicles using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
    Dragovic, Rebecca A.
    Gardiner, Christopher
    Brooks, Alexandra S.
    Tannetta, Dionne S.
    Ferguson, David J. P.
    Hole, Patrick
    Carr, Bob
    Redman, Christopher W. G.
    Harris, Adrian L.
    Dobson, Peter J.
    Harrison, Paul
    Sargent, Ian L.
    [J]. NANOMEDICINE-NANOTECHNOLOGY BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2011, 7 (06) : 780 - 788
  • [8] Extracellular vesicles: biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities
    EL Andaloussi, Samir
    Maeger, Imre
    Breakefield, Xandra O.
    Wood, Matthew J. A.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2013, 12 (05) : 348 - 358
  • [9] Extracellular vesicle sizing and enumeration by nanoparticle tracking analysis
    Gardiner, Chris
    Ferreira, Yannick J.
    Dragovic, Rebecca A.
    Redman, Christopher W. G.
    Sargent, Ian L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES, 2013, 2 (01):
  • [10] Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscopy Nanostructural Study of Shed Microparticles
    Issman, Liron
    Brenner, Benjamin
    Talmon, Yeshayahu
    Aharon, Anat
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):