Consensus and stratification in the affective meaning of human sociality

被引:33
作者
Ambrasat, Jens [1 ,2 ]
von Scheve, Christian [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Conrad, Markus [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Schauenburg, Gesche [2 ,3 ]
Schroeder, Tobias [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Sociol, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Cluster Excellence Languages Emot, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[3] Free Univ Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[4] German Inst Econ Res DIW, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[5] Univ La Laguna, Dept Cognit Psychol, San Cristobal De La Lagu 8204, Santa Cruz De T, Spain
[6] Univ Appl Sci Potsdam, Inst Urban Futures, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
cultural concensus; affect control theory; large-scale survey; cluster analysis; mixed-effects models; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1313321111
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We investigate intrasocietal consensus and variation in affective meanings of concepts related to authority and community, two elementary forms of human sociality. Survey participants (n = 2,849) from different socioeconomic status (SES) groups in German society provided ratings of 909 social concepts along three basic dimensions of affective meaning. Results show widespread consensus on these meanings within society and demonstrate that a meaningful structure of socially shared knowledge emerges from organizing concepts according to their affective similarity. The consensus finding is further qualified by evidence for subtle systematic variation along SES differences. In relation to affectively neutral words, high-status individuals evaluate intimacyrelated and socially desirable concepts as less positive and powerful than middle-or low-status individuals, while perceiving antisocial concepts as relatively more threatening. This systematic variation across SES groups suggests that the affective meaning of sociality is to some degree a function of social stratification.
引用
收藏
页码:8001 / 8006
页数:6
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1973, Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis
[2]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[3]   The unbearable automaticity of being [J].
Bargh, JA ;
Chartrand, TL .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 54 (07) :462-479
[4]  
Barrett L F., 2009, Affect as a psychological primitive
[5]  
BATES D., 2012, Linear mixed model implementation in lme4
[6]  
Belica C, 2011, KORPORA LEHRE FORSCH, P155
[7]  
Bourdieu P., 1987, DISTINCTION SOCIAL C, DOI [10.4324/9780429494338-6, DOI 10.1002/9780470755679.CH15]
[8]  
Bourdieu P., 1984, Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education
[9]  
Calinski T., 1974, Communications in Statistics-theory and Methods, V3, P1, DOI [10.1080/03610927408827101, DOI 10.1080/03610927408827101]
[10]   Class and status: The conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance [J].
Chan, Tak Wing ;
Goldthorpe, John H. .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 72 (04) :512-532