Curvelet analysis of breast masses on dynamic magnetic resonance mammography

被引:5
|
作者
Nirouei, Mahyar [1 ]
Pouladian, Majid [2 ]
Abdolmaleki, Parviz [3 ]
Akhlaghpoor, Shahram [4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Sci & Res Branch, Dept Med Radiat Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Sci & Res Branch, Dept Biomed Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Biol Sci, Dept Biophys, Tehran, Iran
[4] Pardisnoor Med Imaging Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
image texture; image classification; feature extraction; feature selection; biomedical MRI; mammography; medical image processing; neural nets; genetic algorithms; curvelet transforms; statistical analysis; tumours; curvelet analysis; breast masses classification; dynamic magnetic resonance mammography; texture feature extraction; dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; DCE-MRI; curvelet transform; breast tumours; contrast agent distribution; mass lesions; statistical parameters; curvelet coefficients; tumour texture; sub-band image texture; inter-correlated descriptors; genetic algorithm; Pearson correlation; three-layer artificial neural network; benign breast lesion classification; malignant breast lesion classification; GA-ANN model; receiver operating characteristic curve; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FEATURE-EXTRACTION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; WAVELET; CLASSIFICATION; INHIBITORS;
D O I
10.1049/iet-ipr.2017.0125
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This study is devoted to extracting significant texture features from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the breast using curvelet features and to classify breast masses into malignant and benign using the calculated features. The authors utilised the first generation of curvelet transform in the interpretation of breast tumours on DCE-MRI. The analysis is performed after injecting 23 patients with a contrast agent and 23 mass lesions were extracted from these patients. Then, 288 statistical parameters were extracted by calculating the mean and variance of the curvelet coefficients of tumour texture in sub-band images. Due to a large number of extracted features and the presence of redundant and inter-correlated descriptors, they used a combination of genetic algorithm (GA) and Pearson's correlation for feature selection and a three-layer artificial neural network (ANN) for classification of malignant and benign breast lesions. The GA-ANN model has yielded a good diagnostic accuracy (96%), sensitivity (92%) and specificity (100%). Also, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.955. The curvelet transform was able to effectively quantify the distribution of contrast agent in tumour texture, which is different in malignant and benign tumours.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 750
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chaos Analysis of Breast Masses on Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Mammography
    Nirouei, Mahyar
    Pouladian, Majid
    Abdolmaleki, Parviz
    Akhlaghpour, Shahram
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL AND IMAGE PROCESSING (ICSIP), 2016, : 300 - 304
  • [2] Diagnostic performance of mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating mammographically visible breast masses
    Zhu, Xueli
    Cao, Yi
    Li, Ruidie
    Zhu, Mingxia
    Chen, Xin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (09)
  • [3] Dynamic magnetic resonance mammography alone is superior to triple assessment in symptomatic breast disease
    Chatterjee, S
    Drew, PJ
    Fox, JN
    Carelton, PJ
    Turnbull, L
    Read, J
    Monson, JRT
    Kerin, MJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 78 : 14 - 14
  • [4] DIAGNOSTIC VALUES OF MAMMOGRAPHY, ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND DYNAMIC ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN BREAST LESIONS
    Basara, Isil
    Orguc, Sebnem
    Coskun, Teoman
    JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2011, 7 (02): : 118 - 126
  • [5] Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Zhu, Weiwei
    Su, Yu-Ru
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Onega, Tracy
    O'Meara, Ellen S.
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Wernli, Karen
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2024, 116 (02): : 249 - 257
  • [6] Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography
    Malur, S
    Wurdinger, S
    Moritz, A
    Michels, W
    Schneider, A
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2001, 3 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [7] Bayesian analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance breast images
    de Pasquale, F
    Barone, P
    Sebastiani, G
    Stander, J
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2004, 53 : 475 - 493
  • [8] Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography
    Sabine Malur
    Susanne Wurdinger
    Andreas Moritz
    Wolfgang Michels
    Achim Schneider
    Breast Cancer Research, 3
  • [9] Breast cancer. Sonography and magnetic resonance mammography
    Delorme, S
    RADIOLOGE, 2004, 44 (06): : 621 - 639
  • [10] Breast tumors. Mammography by Magnetic Resonance (MRM)
    Cuzino, Dragos
    Naftanaila, Florin
    Baston, Oana
    Blaj, Catalin
    Codorean, Ioan
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MILITARY MEDICINE, 2011, 114 (01) : 4 - 9