Effect of Intrathecally Administered Ketamine, Morphine, and Their Combination Added to Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery a Randomized, Double-Blind Study

被引:16
作者
Abd El-Rahman, Ahmad M. [1 ]
Mohamed, Ashraf A. [1 ]
Mohamed, Sahar A. [1 ]
Mostafa, Mohamed A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Assiut Univ, South Egypt Canc Inst, Dept Anesthesia, Assiut, Egypt
关键词
Intrathecal; Ketamine; Morphine; Lower Abdominal Cancer Surgery; PRESERVATIVE-FREE S(+)-KETAMINE; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; SPINAL-CORD; ANESTHESIA; RABBIT; PAIN;
D O I
10.1093/pm/pnx105
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective. Effective postoperative pain control reduces postoperative morbidity. In this study, we investigated the effects of intrathecal morphine, ketamine, and their combination with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in major abdominal cancer surgery. Study Design. Prospective, randomized, double+ blind. Setting. Academic medical center. Patients and Methods. Ninety ASA I-III patients age 30 to 50 years were divided randomly into three groups: the morphine group (group M) received 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in 2 mL volume and 0.3 mg morphine in 1 mL volume intrathecally. The ketamine group (group K) received 0.1 mg/kg ketamine in 1 mL volume instead of morphine. The morphine ketamine group (group K + M) received both 0.3 mg morphine and 0.1 mg/ kg ketamine in 1 mL volume intrathecally. Postoperative total morphine consumption, first request of analgesia, visual analog score (VAS), and side effects were recorded. Results. Total PCA morphine was significantly decreased in group M + K compared with groups M and K. Time to first request of analgesia was prolonged in groups M and M + K compared with group K (P < 0.001). VAS in group M + K was reduced from two to 24 hours, and in group M from 12 and 18 hours postoperation compared with group K, with an overall good analgesia in the three groups. Sedation was significantly higher in group M + K compared with group M until six hours postoperation. No other side effects were observed. Conclusions. Adding intrathecal ketamine 0.1 mg/ kg to morphine 0.3 mg in patients who underwent major abdominal cancer surgery reduced the total postoperative morphine consumption in comparison with either drug alone, with an overall good postoperative analgesia in all groups, with no side effects apart from sedation.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 568
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Combined Intrathecal Morphine and Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery
    Abdel-Ghaffar, Hala Saad
    Mohamed, Sahar Abdel-Baky
    Fares, Khaled Mohamed
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (11) : 2109 - 2118
  • [2] ANALGESIC EFFECT OF INTRATHECAL KETAMINE IN RATS
    AHUJA, BR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1983, 55 (10) : 991 - 995
  • [3] Arati S, 2009, INT J ANESTH, V24
  • [4] Comparison Between the Effects of Intravenous Morphine, Tramadol, and Ketorolac on Stress and Immune Responses in Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy
    Bakr, Mohamed A. -E. -M.
    Amr, Samy A. -E. R.
    Mohamed, Sahar A.
    Hamed, Hosny B.
    Abd EL-Rahman, Ahmad M.
    Mostafa, Mohamed A. M.
    El Sherif, Fatma A.
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 32 (10) : 889 - 897
  • [5] Bansal SK, 1994, INDIAN J ANAESTH, V42, P32
  • [6] INTRATHECAL KETAMINE FOR WAR SURGERY - A PRELIMINARY-STUDY UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS
    BION, JF
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 39 (10) : 1023 - 1028
  • [7] BORGBJERG FM, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V79, P105
  • [8] Ketamine and Peripheral Inflammation
    De Kock, Marc
    Loix, Sebastien
    Lavand'homme, Patricia
    [J]. CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 19 (06) : 403 - 410
  • [9] Haas D A, 1992, Anesth Prog, V39, P61
  • [10] Microglial Ca2+-Activated K+ Channels Are Possible Molecular Targets for the Analgesic Effects of S-Ketamine on Neuropathic Pain
    Hayashi, Yoshinori
    Kawaji, Kodai
    Sun, Li
    Zhang, Xinwen
    Koyano, Kiyoshi
    Yokoyama, Takeshi
    Kohsaka, Shinichi
    Inoue, Kazuhide
    Nakanishi, Hiroshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (48) : 17370 - 17382