Geospatial assessment of soil erosion vulnerability at watershed level in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha river basin, Jharkhand, India

被引:77
作者
Chatterjee, Shuvabrata [1 ]
Krishna, A. P. [2 ]
Sharma, A. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Council Agr Res, CIFRI, Kolkata, India
[2] Birla Inst Technol, Dept Remote Sensing, Ranchi, Bihar, India
关键词
Watershed management; Soil erosion; USLE; Remote sensing; LULC change; Subarnarekha River Basin; LAND-COVER CHANGE; LOSS EQUATION; SUBHUMID CLIMATES; PRECIPITATION; URBANIZATION; RESPONSES; RUNOFF; SYSTEM; IMPACT; RUSLE;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-013-2439-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Undulating landscapes of Chhotanagpur plateau of the Indian state of Jharkhand suffer from soil erosion vulnerability of varying degrees. An investigation was undertaken in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha River Basin falling within this state. An empirical equation known as Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) was utilized for estimating the soil loss. Analysis of remote sensing satellite data, digital elevation model (DEM) and geographical information system (GIS)-based geospatial approach together with USLE led to the soil erosion assessment. Erosion vulnerability assessment was performed by analyzing raster grids of topography acquired from Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global DEM data. LANDSAT TM and ETM+ satellite data of March 2001 and March 2011 were used for inferring the land use-land cover characteristics of the watershed for these years, respectively. USLE equation was computed within the GIS framework to derive annual soil erosion rates and also the areas with varying degrees of erosion vulnerability. Erosion vulnerability units thus identified covered five severity classes of erosion ranging from very low (0-5 ton ha(-1) yr(-1)) to very severe (> 40 ton ha(-1) yr(-1)). Results indicated an overall increase of erosion in the year 2011 as compared to the erosion computed for the year 2001. Maximum soil erosion rate during the year 2001 was found up to 40 ton ha(-1) yr(-1), whereas this went up to 49.80 ton ha(-1) yr(-1) for the year 2011. Factors for the increase in overall erosion could be variation in rainfall, decrease in vegetation or protective land covers and most important but not limited to the increase in built-up or impervious areas as well.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 374
页数:18
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Ali S, 2005, APPL ENG AGRIC, V21, P217
[2]  
Andersen DG, 1970, 2001C US GEOL SURV, P26
[3]  
[Anonymous], HYDR SCS NAT ENG HDB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, REMOTE SENSING IMAGE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, IMPACTS CHANGES HYDR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1986, URBAN HYDROLOGY SMAL, V55
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1978, HANDBOOK
[8]   Impervious surface coverage - The emergence of a key environmental indicator [J].
Arnold, CL ;
Gibbons, CJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1996, 62 (02) :243-258
[9]   Mapping soil erosion susceptibility using remote sensing and GIS: a case of the Upper Nam Wa Watershed, Nan Province, Thailand [J].
Bahadur, K. C. Krishna .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2009, 57 (03) :695-705
[10]   The response of soil erosion and sediment export to land-use change in four areas of Europe: The importance of landscape pattern [J].
Bakker, Martha M. ;
Govers, Gerard ;
van Doom, Anne ;
Quetier, Fabien ;
Chouvardas, Dimitris ;
Rounsevell, Mark .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2008, 98 (3-4) :213-226