Multidetector computed tomography cholangiography with multiplanar reformation for the assessment of patients with biliary obstruction

被引:21
作者
Kim, Hong Joo
Park, Dong Il
Park, Jung Ho
Cho, Yong Kyun
Il Sohn, Chong
Jeon, Woo Kyu
Kim, Byung Ik
Kim, Seung Kwon
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Internal Med, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Seoul 110746, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Radiol, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Seoul 110746, South Korea
关键词
bile duct obstruction; endoscopic retrograde cholangiography; magnetic resonance cholangiography; multidetector computed tomography cholangiography; multiplanar reformation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04503.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic use of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) cholangiography with multiplanar reformation (MPR) for the assessment of patients with biliary obstruction. Methods: MDCT cholangiography with the MPR technique was performed in 58 patients who were thought to have biliary obstruction. No cholangiographic contrast agent was administered. MRCP in 24 patients, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 46 patients and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) in 24 patients were performed. Eighteen patients underwent biopsy or surgery. The findings on MDCT cholangiography were compared with those of MRCP, ERCP, PTC, biopsy or surgery. Results: The findings of MDCT cholangiography were as follows: choledocholithiasis (n = 34, 56.7%), malignant stricture (n = 14, 23.3%), benign stricture (n = 1, 1.7%), and cholelithiasis (n = 11, 18.3%). A small common bile duct (CBD) stone in one patient could not be detected on MDCT cholangiography. One patient with a small stone in distal CBD detected on MDCT cholangiography had no stone on ERCP. Two patients with initial diagnoses of CBD stones by MDCT cholangiography were disclosed to have malignant bile duct stricture by reference examination. The sensitivity and specificity of MDCT cholangiography for the diagnosis of bile duct stones were 96.9% and 96.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MDCT cholangiography for the diagnosis of bile duct stricture were 85.7% and 100%, respectively. The overall accuracy of MDCT cholangiography for the diagnoses of the causes of biliary obstruction was 89.8%. Conclusion: MDCT cholangiography with the MPR technique is a fast and non-invasive technique with relatively high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnoses of the causes of biliary obstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 405
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] ALI A, 2004, AM J ROENTGENOL, V183, P1327
  • [2] CT EVALUATION OF GALLSTONES INVITRO - CORRELATION WITH CHEMICAL-ANALYSIS
    BARON, RL
    ROHRMANN, CA
    LEE, SP
    SHUMAN, WP
    TEEFEY, SA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1988, 151 (06) : 1123 - 1128
  • [3] GALLSTONE CHARACTERIZATION - THE ROLE OF IMAGING
    BARON, RL
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 26 (03) : 216 - 225
  • [4] Imaging the spectrum of biliary tract disease
    Baron, RL
    Tublin, ME
    Peterson, MS
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 40 (06) : 1325 - +
  • [5] Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: Diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography
    Becker, CD
    Grossholz, M
    Becker, M
    Mentha, G
    dePeyer, R
    Terrier, F
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (02) : 523 - 530
  • [6] The clinical utility of spiral CT cholangiography
    Breen, DJ
    Nicholson, AA
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 55 (10) : 733 - 739
  • [7] Helical CT cholangiography with three-dimensional volume rendering using an oral biliary contrast agent: Feasibility of a novel technique
    Caoili, EM
    Paulson, EK
    Heyneman, LE
    Branch, MS
    Eubanks, WS
    Nelson, RC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (02) : 487 - 492
  • [8] Helical CT cholangiography with oral cholecystographic contrast material
    Chopra, S
    Chintapalli, KN
    Ramakrishna, K
    Rhim, H
    Dodd, GD
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (02) : 596 - 601
  • [9] Coakley FV, 1999, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V9, P157, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199902)9:2<157::AID-JMRI2>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-N