Early Canadian Multicenter Experience With WATCHMAN for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure

被引:23
|
作者
Saw, Jacqueline [1 ]
Fahmy, Peter [1 ]
Azzalini, Lorenzo [2 ]
Marquis, Jean-Francois [3 ]
Hibbert, Benjamin [3 ]
Morillo, Carlos [4 ]
Carrizo, Aldo [4 ]
Ibrahim, Reda [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, 2775 Laurel St,Level 9, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Montreal Heart Inst, Div Cardiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Ottawa Heart Inst, Div Cardiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Hamilton Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
clinical: implantable devices--atrial fibrillation; left atrial appendage closure; ORAL ANTICOAGULATION; FIBRILLATION; DEVICE; PREVENTION; STROKE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1111/jce.13168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure BackgroundThere are limited data with WATCHMAN (Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, MA, USA) for left atrial appendage (LAA) closure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and contraindications to anticoagulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of WATCHMAN in our early Canadian experience. MethodsWe report our pooled consecutive series of patients who underwent WATCHMAN implantation at four major Canadian centers. Indications for LAA closure were CHADS(2) 1 or CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc 2, and contraindication/intolerance to or failure on anticoagulation. Follow-up imaging was typically performed 1-6 months postprocedure. ResultsOne hundred and six patients underwent LAA closure with WATCHMAN from May 2013 to October 2015. The mean age was 74.8 7.7, mean CHADS(2) score was 2.8 +/- 1.2, CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was 4.3 +/- 1.5, and HASBLED score was 3.2 +/- 1.2. Permanent AF was present in 67.9% and paroxysmal AF in 32.1%. Indications for LAA closure were prior bleeding 89.6% (87 major bleeding and 8 minor bleeding), 9.4% were deemed high risk for bleeding, and 0.9% with recurrent strokes on warfarin. Procedural success was 97.2% (103 of 106), with one device embolization (snared percutaneously), one implant failure due to inadequate LAA depth, and one cardiac perforation requiring surgical repair before WATCHMAN implantation. The composite major safety event-rate was 1.9% (1 death and 1 device embolization). Mean hospital stay was 1.8 +/- 4.7 days. Antithrombotic therapy postimplant included dual antiplatelet therapy in 76 of 103 (73.8%). Mean follow-up was 210 +/- 182 days; there were two transient ischemic attacks, with estimated 66% reduction in thromboembolic events relative to CHADS(2) predicted risk. ConclusionIn our early Canadian experience, WATCHMAN for LAA closure in patients contraindicated to anticoagulation appeared safe and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 401
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison between Amulet and Watchman left atrial appendage closure devices: A real-world, single center experience
    Saad, Mohammed
    Risha, Osama
    Sano, Makoto
    Fink, Thomas
    Heeger, Christian-Hendrik
    Vogler, Julia
    Sciacca, Vanessa
    Eitel, Charlotte
    Stiermaier, Thomas
    Joost, Alexander
    Keelani, Ahmad
    Fuernau, Georg
    Meyer-Saraei, Roza
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    Eitel, Ingo
    Tilz, Roland Richard
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2021, 37
  • [22] Predictors of thrombus formation after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN device
    Kaneko, Hidehiro
    Neuss, Michael
    Weissenborn, Jens
    Butter, Christian
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2017, 32 (09) : 1137 - 1143
  • [23] Long-Term Results With Left Atrial Appendage Closure Watching the Watchman
    Saw, Jacqueline
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (24) : 2976 - 2978
  • [24] Percutaneous closure of an incomplete left atrial appendage closure
    Viehmann, Manuel
    Daehnert, Ingo
    Schuler, Gerhard
    Sandri, Marcus
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 105 (09) : 791 - 793
  • [25] Evaluation of the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage closure device
    Alli, Oluseun
    Holmes, David, Jr.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2014, 11 (06) : 541 - 551
  • [26] Left atrial appendage closure: First in man with the 4th generation watchman device
    Ledwoch, Jakob
    Franke, Jennifer
    Gonzaga, Maik
    Bertog, Stefan
    Braut, Annkathrin
    Hofmann, Ilona
    Vaskelyte, Laura
    Gafoor, Sameer
    Reddy, Vivek
    Sievert, Horst
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 87 (04) : 787 - 794
  • [27] Safety of Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Watchman Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Sawaya, Fadi
    Abi-Saleh, Bernard
    Hoteit, Abbas
    Jdaidany, Jennifer
    Moumneh, Mohamad B.
    Harbieh, Bernard
    Khoury, Maurice
    Aramouni, Salim
    Abdulhai, Farah
    Refaat, Marwan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [28] Experience of left atrial appendage occlusion with the WATCHMAN device in Chinese patients
    Zhai, Zhengqin
    Tang, Min
    Su, Xi
    Chu, Huimin
    Huang, Weijian
    Zeng, Jie
    Wang, Jianan
    Fang, Pihua
    Yin, Xiaomeng
    Ma, Genshan
    Zhao, Shuang
    Zhang, Shu
    ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 21 (06) : 314 - 321
  • [29] Comparison in Short-Term Safety and Efficacy between New-Generation WATCHMAN FLX and Conventional WATCHMAN 2.5 for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure
    Fukuda, Nobuyuki
    Imamura, Teruhiko
    Tanaka, Shuhei
    Kataoka, Naoya
    Ushijima, Ryuichi
    Ueno, Hiroshi
    Kinugawa, Koichiro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [30] Left Atrial Appendage Closure with the Watchman FLX System in a Patient with Hypertrophic Cardiomy
    Funaki, Takashi
    Saji, Mike
    Terada, Mai
    Takamisawa, Itaru
    Nanasato, Mamoru
    Nagao, Takehiko
    Ikeda, Takanori
    Isobe, Mitsuaki
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 63 (03) : 399 - 402