Barriers to the adoption of blockchain technology in business supply chains: a total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) approach

被引:154
作者
Mathivathanan, Deepak [1 ]
Mathiyazhagan, K. [2 ]
Rana, Nripendra P. [3 ]
Khorana, Sangeeta [4 ]
Dwivedi, Yogesh K. [5 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Inst Business Adm, Ctr Logist & Supply Chain Management, Loyola Coll Campus, Chennai, TN, India
[2] Amity Univ, Amity Sch Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Sect 125, Noida 201313, UP, India
[3] Univ Bradford, Sch Management, Bradford BD7 1DP, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Bournemouth Univ, Sch Business, Bournemouth, Dorset, England
[5] Swansea Univ, Sch Management, Bay Campus, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
关键词
Blockchain; Supply Chain; Barriers; Total Interpretive Structural Modelling; MICMAC;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2020.1868597
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Blockchain is an emerging technology with a wide array of potential applications. This technology, which underpins cryptocurrency, provides an immutable, decentralised, and transparent distributed database of digital assets for use by firms in supply chains. However, not all firms are appropriately suited to adopt blockchain in the existing supply chain primarily due to their lack of knowledge on the benefits of this technology. Using Total Interpretive Structural Modelling (TISM) and Cross-Impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification (MICMAC), this paper identifies the adoption barriers, examines the interrelationships between them to the adoption of blockchain technology, which has the potential to revolutionise supply chains. The TISM technique supports developing a contextual relationship-based structural model to identify the influential barriers. MICMAC classifies the barriers in blockchain adoption based on their strength and dependence. The results of this research indicate that the lack of business awareness and familiarity with blockchain technology on what it can deliver for future supply chains, are the most influential barriers that impede blockchain adoption. These barriers hinder and impact businesses decision to establish a blockchain-enabled supply chain and that other barriers act as secondary and linked variables in the adoption process.
引用
收藏
页码:3338 / 3359
页数:22
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] A Case Study for Blockchain in Manufacturing: "FabRec": A Prototype for Peer-to-Peer Network of Manufacturing Nodes
    Angrish, Atin
    Craver, Benjamin
    Hasan, Mahmud
    Starly, Binil
    [J]. 46TH SME NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE, NAMRC 46, 2018, 26 : 1180 - 1192
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, DEEP SHIFT TECHNOLOG
  • [3] Apte S., 2016, J EXCIPIENTS FOOD CH, V7
  • [4] How blockchain improves the supply chain: case study alimentary supply chain
    Casado-Vara, Roberto
    Prieto, Javier
    De la Prieta, Fernando
    Corchado, Juan M.
    [J]. 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE SYSTEMS AND PERVASIVE COMPUTING (MOBISPC 2018) / THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE NETWORKS AND COMMUNICATIONS (FNC-2018) / AFFILIATED WORKSHOPS, 2018, 134 : 393 - 398
  • [5] Blockchain in global supply chains and cross border trade: a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities
    Chang, Yanling
    Iakovou, Eleftherios
    Shi, Weidong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (07) : 2082 - 2099
  • [6] Cho S, 2017, INT J GRID DISTRIB, V10, P93, DOI 10.14257/ijgdc.2017.10.12.09
  • [7] Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things
    Christidis, Konstantinos
    Devetsikiotis, Michael
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2016, 4 : 2292 - 2303
  • [8] Deshpande A., 2017, Overview report, V40, P40
  • [9] Analysis of enablers for implementation of sustainable supply chain management - A textile case
    Diabat, Ali
    Kannan, Devika
    Mathiyazhagan, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 83 : 391 - 403
  • [10] Benchmarking the interactions among barriers in third-party logistics implementation An ISM approach
    Diabat, Ali
    Khreishah, Abdallah
    Kannan, Govindan
    Panikar, Vinay
    Gunasekaran, Angappa
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2013, 20 (06) : 805 - 824