Fairness at the Group Level: Justice Climate and Intraunit Justice Climate

被引:188
作者
Li, Andrew [1 ]
Cropanzano, Russell [2 ]
机构
[1] W Texas A&M Univ, Dept Management Mkt & Gen Business, Coll Business, Canyon, TX USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Eller Coll Management, Dept Management & Org, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
justice climate; intraunit justice climate; organizational justice; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE THEORY; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS; SURVIVORS REACTIONS; PERCEPTIONS; CITIZENSHIP; ANTECEDENTS; WORKPLACE; RESPECT;
D O I
10.1177/0149206308330557
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Like many constructs within the managerial sciences, organizational justice has traditionally been conceptualized as an individual-level phenomenon. In recent years, this has begun to change, as a number of research studies have explored justice as a collective or group-level construct. The authors provide a review of this literature, historically tracing the growth of this research tradition, reviewing measurement issues, and discussing available research findings. The authors argue that there are at least two viable treatments of unit-level justice. Justice climate pertains to the manner in which a team is treated by outside agents, such as an authority figure. Intraunit justice climate pertains to the manner in which teammates treat one another. Although much more research is needed, evidence suggests that both justice climate and intraunit fairness are useful predictors of work attitudes and behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 599
页数:36
相关论文
共 137 条
[61]  
Greenleaf R.K., 2003, The servant-leader within: A transformative path
[62]  
GREENLEAF RK, 2005, SEVANT LEADERSHIP JO
[63]   An analysis of empirical research on the scope of justice [J].
Hafer, CL ;
Olson, JM .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2003, 7 (04) :311-323
[64]   Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence [J].
Hoegl, M ;
Gemuenden, HG .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (04) :435-449
[65]   ESTIMATING WITHIN-GROUP INTERRATER RELIABILITY WITH AND WITHOUT RESPONSE BIAS [J].
JAMES, LR ;
DEMAREE, RG ;
WOLF, G .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 69 (01) :85-98
[66]   The effects of overhearing peers discuss an authority's fairness reputation on reactions to subsequent treatment [J].
Jones, DA ;
Skarlicki, DP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (02) :363-372
[67]   Issues in the transition to teams [J].
Jones, RG ;
Lindley, WD .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 13 (01) :31-40
[68]   FAIRNESS AND THE ASSUMPTIONS OF ECONOMICS [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
KNETSCH, JL ;
THALER, RH .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1986, 59 (04) :S285-S300
[69]  
Kanfer R., 1987, Social Justice Research, V1, P235
[70]  
Kirkman B.L., 1996, SOC JUSTICE RES, V11, P47, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02197656