Utility engagement with payments for watershed services in the United States

被引:66
作者
Bennett, Drew E. [1 ]
Gosnell, Hannah [1 ]
Lurie, Susan [2 ]
Duncan, Sally [3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Coll Earth Ocean & Atmospher Sci, Geog Program, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Inst Nat Resources, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Sch Publ Policy, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
Payments for ecosystem services (PES); Utilities; Water resources; United States; Regulation; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; PROJECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.02.001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This research demonstrates the growing use of payments for watershed services (PWS) by drinking water, wastewater, and electric utilities in the USA to meet a variety of objectives and considers the potential these widespread and long established institutions hold in driving PWS implementation and mainstreaming ecosystem services approaches. We developed a working typology highlighting similarities and differences among 37 identified programs covering source water protection, fire risk mitigation, point source pollution offsets, voluntary customer offsets, and hydropower mitigation. We identified six distinct mechanisms for funding the identified programs. Sales taxes and bond measures generated he most annual funding per capita while voluntary ratepayer contributions and donated water conservation savings generated the least. A variety of actors were involved in the implementation of these different programs. Notably, nonprofit organizations were critical to each program type and often acted as important intermediaries, facilitating transactions among utilities and landowners. We found these initiatives face multiple challenges including the difficulty of demonstrating the business case for investments in ecosystem services and changes in the regulatory environment that can decrease ecosystem service demand and limit flexibility in pursuing PWS approaches. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 64
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
  • [2] [Anonymous], LANGUAGE CONSERVATIO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, RES METHODS ANTHR
  • [4] Bennett G., 2013, Charting new waters: State of watershed payments 2012
  • [5] Blaine JG, 2006, J N AM BENTHOL SOC, V25, P851, DOI 10.1899/0887-3593(2006)025[0851:ESMFNY]2.0.CO
  • [6] 2
  • [7] The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services
    Brauman, Kate A.
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    Duarte, T. Kaeo
    Mooney, Harold A.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2007, 32 : 67 - 98
  • [8] Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services
    Brouwer, Roy
    Tesfaye, Abonesh
    Pauw, Pieter
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 38 (04) : 380 - 392
  • [9] Carpe Diem West, 2011, WAT INV PROGR AM W
  • [10] A Watershed Approach to Improve Water Quality: Case Study of Clean Water Services' Tualatin River Program
    Cochran, Bobby
    Logue, Charles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2011, 47 (01): : 29 - 38