The effect of acoustic feedback in an auditory Posner paradigm: delay effect and bias in ERP

被引:0
作者
Invitto, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Capone, Carola [1 ]
Gigante, Graziano [1 ]
Piraino, Giulia [2 ,3 ]
Sisinni, Bianca [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salento, Dept Biol & Environm Sci & Technol, Human Anat & Neurosci Lab, Lecce, Italy
[2] Univ Salento, DReAM Diffused Lab Interdisciplinary Res Appl Med, Lecce, Italy
[3] Ist Santa Chiara, Lecce, Italy
关键词
attentional bias; delay effect; stuttering; altered auditory feedback; auditory Posner task; SPEECH PRODUCTION; SUSCEPTIBILITY; POTENTIALS; SPEAKERS;
D O I
10.7358/neur-2019-025-invi
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A 'delay effect' occurs when a subect hears the sound of his own voice that is delayed by few milliseconds. This abnormal feedback induces difficulties in the articulation of language. This study aims to investigate ERP modulation during an auditory Posner paradigm an auditory delay effect (DAF) training. Main ERPs results highlighted delayed latencies and greater amplitudes after DAF This can indicate how auditory feedback systems affect motor and auditory attentional early processes, by altering not only the task itself in language performance, but also producing a delayed bias in ERP components. So, if the acoustic feedback is naturally presented without delayed latency (NDAF), subjects will have no difflculty in producing verbal language and no ERP bias. If the stimulus is presented as DAF, subjects will present difficulties in articulating language, and will show ERP bias, in particular in frontoparietal in temporoparietal and in parietal ROt This highlights the momentary interruption of an automatic process.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 37
页数:17
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Group and individual variability in speech production networks during delayed auditory feedback [J].
Agnew, Z. K. ;
McGettigan, C. ;
Banks, B. ;
Scott, S. K. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 143 (05) :3009-3023
[2]   STUTTERING - SPEECH PATTERN CHARACTERISTICS UNDER FLUENCY-INDUCING CONDITIONS [J].
ANDREWS, G ;
HOWIE, PM ;
DOZSA, M ;
GUITAR, BE .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1982, 25 (02) :208-216
[3]   The Effect Of Delayed Side-Tone Upon Vocal Rate And Intensity [J].
Black, John W. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1951, 16 (01) :56-60
[4]   Functional anatomy of intra- and cross-modal lexical tasks [J].
Booth, JR ;
Burman, DD ;
Meyer, JR ;
Gitelman, DR ;
Parrish, TD ;
Mesulam, MM .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (01) :7-22
[5]   INTERPRETATION OF RESEARCH ON FEEDBACK INTERRUPTION IN SPEECH [J].
BORDEN, GJ .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1979, 7 (03) :307-319
[6]   SUSCEPTIBILITY TO DELAYED AUDITORY FEEDBACK AND DEPENDENCE ON AUDITORY OR ORAL SENSORY FEEDBACK [J].
BURKE, BD .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 1975, 8 (01) :75-96
[7]   Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: An fMRl study employing overt speech [J].
Christoffels, Ingrid K. ;
Formisano, Elia ;
Schiller, Niels O. .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2007, 28 (09) :868-879
[8]   Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: who's in control? [J].
Cohen, JD ;
Botvinick, M ;
Carter, CS .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (05) :421-423
[9]   Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically [J].
de Jong, Nivja H. ;
Wempe, Ton .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (02) :385-390
[10]   Relating the mechanisms of orienting and alerting [J].
FernandezDuque, D ;
Posner, MI .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1997, 35 (04) :477-486