A simulation-based multi-objective genetic algorithm (SMOGA) procedure for BOT network design problem

被引:69
|
作者
Chen, Anthony [1 ]
Subprasom, Kitti
Ji, Zhaowang
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Dept Highways, Planning Div, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
关键词
Network design problem; Multiple objectives; Demand uncertainty; Simulation; Genetic algorithm;
D O I
10.1007/s11081-006-9970-y
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Solving optimization problems with multiple objectives under uncertainty is generally a very difficult task. Evolutionary algorithms, particularly genetic algorithms, have shown to be effective in solving this type of complex problems. In this paper, we develop a simulation-based multi-objective genetic algorithm (SMOGA) procedure to solve the build-operate-transfer (BOT) network design problem with multiple objectives under demand uncertainty. The SMOGA procedure integrates stochastic simulation, a traffic assignment algorithm, a distance-based method, and a genetic algorithm (GA) to solve a multi-objective BOT network design problem formulated as a stochastic bi-level mathematical program. To demonstrate the feasibility of SMOGA procedure, we solve two mean-variance models for determining the optimal toll and capacity in a BOT roadway project subject to demand uncertainty. Using the inter-city expressway in the Pearl River Delta Region of South China as a case study, numerical results show that the SMOGA procedure is robust in generating 'good' non-dominated solutions with respect to a number of parameters used in the GA, and performs better than the weighted-sum method in terms of the quality of non-dominated solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 247
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Species-Based Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization Problems
    Sun Fuquan
    Wang Hongfeng
    Lu Fuqiang
    2014 11TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (WCICA), 2014, : 5063 - 5066
  • [32] MOONGA: Multi-Objective Optimization of Wireless Network Approach Based on Genetic Algorithm
    Bouzid, S. E.
    Seresstou, Y.
    Raoof, K.
    Omri, M. N.
    Mbarki, M.
    Dridi, C.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 105793 - 105814
  • [33] GenExp: Multi-objective pruning for deep neural network based on genetic algorithm
    Xu, Ke
    Zhang, Dezheng
    An, Jianjing
    Liu, Li
    Liu, Lingzhi
    Wang, Dong
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2021, 451 : 81 - 94
  • [34] THE SIMULATION-BASED MULTI-OBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY OPTIMIZATION (SIMEON) FRAMEWORK
    Halim, Ronald Apriliyanto
    Seck, Mamadou D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2011, : 2834 - 2846
  • [35] Satellite Constellation Design with Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm for Regional Terrestrial Satellite Network
    Cuiqin Dai
    Guimin Zheng
    Qianbin Chen
    中国通信, 2018, 15 (08) : 1 - 10
  • [36] Sustainable Value Recovery of NdFeB Magnets: A Multi-Objective Network Design and Genetic Algorithm
    Jin, Hongyue
    Song, Byung Duk
    Yih, Yuehwern
    Sutherland, John W.
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2018, 6 (04): : 4767 - 4775
  • [37] Efficient transit network design and frequencies setting multi-objective optimization by alternating objective genetic algorithm
    Arbex, Renato Oliveira
    da Cunha, Claudio Barbieri
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2015, 81 : 355 - 376
  • [38] Survey of multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on genetic algorithm
    Li Li
    Pan Feng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, 2007, : 363 - 366
  • [39] The multi-objective network design problem using minimizing externalities as objectives: comparison of a genetic algorithm and simulated annealing framework
    Possel, Bastiaan
    Wismans, Luc J. J.
    Van Berkum, Eric C.
    Bliemer, Michiel C. J.
    TRANSPORTATION, 2018, 45 (02) : 545 - 572
  • [40] The multi-objective network design problem using minimizing externalities as objectives: comparison of a genetic algorithm and simulated annealing framework
    Bastiaan Possel
    Luc J. J. Wismans
    Eric C. Van Berkum
    Michiel C. J. Bliemer
    Transportation, 2018, 45 : 545 - 572