Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation

被引:641
作者
Brook, AD [1 ]
Ahrens, TS
Schaiff, R
Prentice, D
Sherman, G
Shannon, W
Kollef, MH
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Gen Med Sci & Biostat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Barnes Jewish Hosp, Dept Nursing, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Barnes Jewish Hosp, Dept Pharm, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
sedation; mechanical ventilation; critical care; outcomes; intensive care unit; tracheostomy;
D O I
10.1097/00003246-199912000-00001
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare a practice of protocol-directed sedation during mechanical ventilation implemented by nurses with traditional non-protocol-directed sedation administration. Design: Randomized, controlled clinical trial. Setting: Medical intensive care unit (19 beds) in an urban teaching hospital. Patients: Patients requiring mechanical ventilation (n = 321). Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either protocol-directed sedation (n = 162) or non-protocol-directed sedation (n = 159). Measurements and Main Results: The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 55.9 hrs (95% confidence interval, 41.0-90.0 hrs) for patients managed with protocol-directed sedation and 117.0 hrs (95% confidence interval, 96.0-155.6 hrs) for patients receiving non-protocol-directed sedation. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients in the protocol-directed sedation group had statistically shorter durations of mechanical ventilation than patients in the non-protocol-directed sedation group (chi-square = 7.00, p = .008, log rank test; chi-square = 8.54, p = .004, Wilcoxon's test; chi-square = 9.18, p = .003, -2 log test). Lengths of stay in the intensive care unit (5.7 +/- 5.9 days vs, 7.5 +/- 6.5 days; p = .013) and hospital (14.0 +/- 17.3 days vs. 19.9 +/- 24.2 days; p < .001) were also significantly shorter among patients in the protocol-directed sedation group. Among the 132 patients (41.1%) receiving continuous intravenous sedation, those in the protocol-directed sedation group (n = 66) had a significantly shorter duration of continuous intravenous sedation than those in the non-protocol-directed sedation group (n = 66) (3.5 +/- 4.0 days vs, 5.6 +/- 6.4 days; p = .003). Patients in the protocol-directed sedation group also had a significantly lower tracheostomy rate compared with patients in the non-protocol-directed sedation group (10 of 162 patients [6.2%] vs, 21 of 159 patients [13.2%], p = .038). Conclusions: The use of protocol-directed sedation can reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation, the intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, and the need far tracheostomy among critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure.
引用
收藏
页码:2609 / 2615
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   OPTIMAL INTRAVENOUS DOSING STRATEGIES FOR SEDATIVES AND ANALGESICS IN THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT [J].
BARR, J ;
DONNER, A .
CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 1995, 11 (04) :827-&
[2]   THE AMERICAN-EUROPEAN CONSENSUS CONFERENCE ON ARDS - DEFINITIONS, MECHANISMS, RELEVANT OUTCOMES, AND CLINICAL-TRIAL COORDINATION [J].
BERNARD, GR ;
ARTIGAS, A ;
BRIGHAM, KL ;
CARLET, J ;
FALKE, K ;
HUDSON, L ;
LAMY, M ;
LEGALL, JR ;
MORRIS, A ;
SPRAGG, R ;
COCHIN, B ;
LANKEN, PN ;
LEEPER, KV ;
MARINI, J ;
MURRAY, JF ;
OPPENHEIMER, L ;
PESENTI, A ;
REID, L ;
RINALDO, J ;
VILLAR, J ;
VANASBECK, BS ;
DHAINAUT, JF ;
MANCEBO, J ;
MATTHAY, M ;
MEYRICK, B ;
PAYEN, D ;
PERRET, C ;
FOWLER, AA ;
SCHALLER, MD ;
HUDSON, LD ;
HYERS, T ;
KNAUS, W ;
MATTHAY, R ;
PINSKY, M ;
BONE, RC ;
BOSKEN, C ;
JOHANSON, WG ;
LEWANDOWSKI, K ;
REPINE, J ;
RODRIGUEZROISIN, R ;
ROUSSOS, C ;
ANTONELLI, MA ;
BELOUCIF, S ;
BIHARI, D ;
BURCHARDI, H ;
LEMAIRE, F ;
MONTRAVERS, P ;
PETTY, TL ;
ROBOTHAM, J ;
ZAPOL, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 149 (03) :818-824
[3]   Developing and testing changes in delivery of care [J].
Berwick, DM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 128 (08) :651-656
[4]   Unplanned extubations in the adult intensive care unit - A prospective multicenter study [J].
Boulain, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 157 (04) :1131-1137
[5]   Comparative study of propofol versus midazolam in the sedation of critically ill patients: Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial [J].
Chamorro, C ;
deLatorre, FJ ;
Montero, A ;
SanchezIzquierdo, JA ;
Jareno, A ;
Moreno, JA ;
Gonzalez, E ;
Barrios, M ;
Carpintero, JL ;
MartinSantos, F ;
Otero, B ;
Ginestal, R .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (06) :932-939
[6]   Morbidity outcome in early versus conventional tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective randomized controlled trial [J].
Cheng, DCH ;
Karski, J ;
Peniston, C ;
Asokumar, B ;
Raveendran, G ;
Carroll, J ;
Nierenberg, H ;
Roger, S ;
Mickle, D ;
Tong, J ;
Zelovitsky, J ;
David, T ;
Sandler, A .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 112 (03) :755-764
[7]   Cooperation: The foundation of improvement [J].
Clemmer, TP ;
Spuhler, VJ ;
Berwick, DM ;
Nolan, TW .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 128 (12) :1004-1009
[8]   Comparative efficacy of patient-controlled administration of morphine, hydromorphone, or sufentanil for the treatment of oral mucositis pain following bone marrow transplantation [J].
Coda, BA ;
OSullivan, B ;
Donaldson, G ;
Bohl, S ;
Chapman, CR ;
Shen, DD .
PAIN, 1997, 72 (03) :333-+
[9]   REDUCTION OF DURATION AND COST OF MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN AN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT BY USE OF A VENTILATORY MANAGEMENT TEAM [J].
COHEN, IL ;
BARI, N ;
STROSBERG, MA ;
WEINBERG, PF ;
WACKSMAN, RM ;
MILLSTEIN, BH ;
FEIN, IA .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1991, 19 (10) :1278-1284
[10]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187