Measurement of fracture toughness by nanoindentation methods: Recent advances and future challenges

被引:186
作者
Sebastiani, M. [1 ]
Johanns, K. E. [2 ]
Herbert, E. G. [3 ,4 ]
Pharr, G. M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Roma TRE Univ, Dept Engn, Rome, Italy
[2] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Dept Mat Sci, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[4] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Mat Sci & Technol Div, Oak Ridge, TN USA
关键词
Fracture toughness; Nanoindentation; Cantilever; Pillar; Micron-scale; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; INDENTATION CRACKING; MICROMETER SCALE; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; VICKERS INDENTATION; RESIDUAL-STRESSES; BRITTLE MATERIALS; THIN COATINGS; MODEL; CERAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cossms.2015.04.003
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, we describe recent advances and developments for the measurement of fracture toughness at small scales by the use of nanoindentation-based methods including techniques based on micro-cantilever, beam bending and micro-pillar splitting. A critical comparison of the techniques is made by testing a selected group of bulk and thin film materials. For pillar splitting, cohesive zone finite element simulations are used to validate a simple relationship between the critical load at failure, the pillar radius, and the fracture toughness for a range of material properties and coating/substrate combinations. The minimum pillar diameter required for nucleation and growth of a crack during indentation is also estimated. An analysis of pillar splitting for a film on a dissimilar substrate material shows that the critical load for splitting is relatively insensitive to the substrate compliance for a large range of material properties. Experimental results from a selected group of materials show good agreement between single cantilever and pillar splitting methods, while a discrepancy of similar to 25% is found between the pillar splitting technique and double-cantilever testing. It is concluded that both the micro-cantilever and pillar splitting techniques are valuable methods for micro-scale assessment of fracture toughness of brittle ceramics, provided the underlying assumptions can be validated. Although the pillar splitting method has some advantages because of the simplicity of sample preparation and testing, it is not applicable to most metals because their higher toughness prevents splitting, and in this case, micro-cantilever bend testing is preferred. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 333
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
ABAQUS, 2008, ABAQUS US MAN
[2]  
Anderson T.L., 2005, Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, V3rd, DOI [10.1201/9781420058215, DOI 10.1201/9781420058215]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, J Mater Res, DOI DOI 10.1557/JMR.1992.1564
[4]   A CRITICAL-EVALUATION OF INDENTATION TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS .1. DIRECT CRACK MEASUREMENTS [J].
ANSTIS, GR ;
CHANTIKUL, P ;
LAWN, BR ;
MARSHALL, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 1981, 64 (09) :533-538
[5]   The fracture toughness of polysilicon microdevices: A first report [J].
Ballarini, R ;
Mullen, RL ;
Yin, Y ;
Kahn, H ;
Stemmer, S ;
Heuer, AH .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1997, 12 (04) :915-922
[6]   Characterisation and wear properties of industrially produced nanoscaled CrN/NbN multilayer coating [J].
Bemporad, E ;
Pecchio, C ;
De Rossi, S ;
Carassiti, F .
SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 188 :319-330
[7]   FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS OF PMMA AS MEASURED WITH INDENTATION CRACKS [J].
CHOI, SR ;
SALEM, JA .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1993, 8 (12) :3210-3217
[8]   DIRECT OBSERVATION AND ANALYSIS OF INDENTATION CRACKING IN GLASSES AND CERAMICS [J].
COOK, RF ;
PHARR, GM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 1990, 73 (04) :787-817
[9]   On the practical application of the cohesive model [J].
Cornec, A ;
Scheider, I ;
Schwalbe, KH .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2003, 70 (14) :1963-1987
[10]   Measuring fracture toughness of coatings using focused-ion-beam-machined microbeams [J].
Di Maio, D ;
Roberts, SG .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2005, 20 (02) :299-302