Iowa Farm Environmental Leaders' Perspectives on the U.S. Farm Bill Conservation Programs

被引:6
作者
Medina, Gabriel [1 ]
Isley, Catherine [2 ]
Arbuckle, J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brasilia, Dept Agron, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[2] Univ Missouri, Div Appl Social Sci, Columbia, MO USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Sociol, Ames, IA USA
关键词
conservation stewardship program (CSP); environmental quality incentive program (EQIP); conservation reserve program (CRP); conservation compliance (CC); sustainable farming; PRACTICE ADOPTION; MANAGEMENT; SOIL;
D O I
10.3389/fsufs.2020.497943
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
As stakeholders prepare to lobby future Farm Bills, this study reveals farmers' perspectives on federal conservation programs. In-depth interviews were held with ten farm environmental leaders, farmers who have extensive experience with conservation practices and federal conservation programs. Results reveal that conservation programs have played a limited but important role in incentivizing the adoption of and offsetting costs for establishing conservation practices. Programs' strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements were also explored; results reveal that most farmers believe existing conservation programs could be improved with relatively minor tweaks and adaptations, such as more flexibility in working land program requirements and adjustments to land retirement program payment rates. To some extent, farm environmental leaders also align themselves with the perspectives of environmental NGOs, advocating for transformative approaches, such as expanding mandatory conservation compliance to all cropland, including non-Highly Erodible Lands cropland.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [21] Agricultural human dimensions research: The role of qualitative research methods
    Prokopy, Linda S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2011, 66 (01) : 9A - 12A
  • [22] Synthesizing Conservation Motivations and Barriers: What Have We Learned from Qualitative Studies of Farmers' Behaviors in the United States?
    Ranjan, Pranay
    Church, Sarah P.
    Floress, Kristin
    Prokopy, Linda S.
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019, 32 (11) : 1171 - 1199
  • [23] Reimer A., 2013, Trends in US agricultural conservation programs
  • [24] Farmers and conservation programs: Explaining differences in Environmental Quality Incentives Program applications between states
    Reimer, A. P.
    Gramig, B. M.
    Prokopy, L. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2013, 68 (02) : 110 - 119
  • [25] Farmer Participation in U.S. Farm Bill Conservation Programs
    Reimer, Adam P.
    Prokopy, Linda S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 53 (02) : 318 - 332
  • [26] The influence of perceptions of practice characteristics: An examination of agricultural best management practice adoption in two Indiana watersheds
    Reimer, Adam P.
    Weinkauf, Denise Klotthor
    Prokopy, Linda Stalker
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2012, 28 (01) : 118 - 128
  • [27] Soil as Social-Ecological Feedback: Examining the "Ethic" of Soil Stewardship among Corn Belt Farmers
    Roesch-McNally, Gabrielle
    Arbuckle, J. Gordon
    Tyndall, John Charles
    [J]. RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2018, 83 (01) : 145 - 173
  • [28] Rosman H.T., 2015, The farmer and farm networks: an examination of conservation adoption in the US corn belt
  • [29] Rundquist S., 2016, FOOLING OURSELVES
  • [30] Farmer selection of sources of information for nitrogen management in the US Midwest: Implications for environmental programs
    Stuart, D.
    Denny, R. C. H.
    Houser, M.
    Reimer, A. P.
    Marquart-Pyatt, S.
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 70 : 289 - 297