Third-party punishment and social norms

被引:1348
作者
Fehr, E [1 ]
Fischbacher, U [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Inst Empir Res Econ, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
social norm; sanction; punishment; strong reciprocity; social preference; third party;
D O I
10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00005-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We examine the characteristics and relative strength of third-party sanctions in a series of experiments. We hypothesize that egalitarian distribution norms and cooperation norms apply in our experiments, and that third parties, whose economic payoff is unaffected by the norm violation, may be willing to enforce these norms although the enforcement is costly for them. Almost two-thirds of the third parties indeed punished the violation of the distribution norm and their punishment increased the more the norm was violated. Likewise, up to roughly 60% of the third parties punished violations of the cooperation norm. Thus, our results show that the notion of strong reciprocity extends to the sanctioning behavior of "unaffected" third parties. In addition, these experiments suggest that third-party punishment games are powerful tools for studying the characteristics and the content of social norms. Further experiments indicate that second parties, whose economic payoff is reduced by the norm violation, punish the violation much more strongly than do third parties. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 87
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   GIVING WITH IMPURE ALTRUISM - APPLICATIONS TO CHARITY AND RICARDIAN EQUIVALENCE [J].
ANDREONI, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1989, 97 (06) :1447-1458
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1983, Review of Personality and Social Psychology
[3]  
[Anonymous], THEORY RECIPROCITY
[4]   The evolution of norms [J].
Bendor, J ;
Swistak, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2001, 106 (06) :1493-1545
[5]   ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition [J].
Bolton, GE ;
Ockenfels, A .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (01) :166-193
[6]   Emotional hazard in a power-to-take experiment [J].
Bosman, R ;
van Winden, F .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2002, 112 (476) :147-169
[7]   The co-evolution of individual behaviors and social institutions [J].
Bowles, S ;
Choi, JK ;
Hopfensitz, A .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 223 (02) :135-147
[8]   The evolution of altruistic punishment [J].
Boyd, R ;
Gintis, H ;
Bowles, S ;
Richerson, PJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (06) :3531-3535
[9]  
Brandts J, 2000, EXP ECON, V2, P227
[10]  
Camerer C, 2003, BEHAV GAME THEORY