A New Multi-Criteria Assessment Model Combining GRA Techniques with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Entropy-Based TOPSIS Method for Sustainable Building Materials Supplier Selection

被引:38
作者
Chen, Chun-Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Takming Univ Sci & Technol, Bachelor Program Real Estate Investment & Managem, 56,Sec 1,Huanshan Rd, Taipei 11451, Taiwan
关键词
multi-criteria assessment model; GRA (grey relational analysis) technique; intuitionistic fuzzy set; Entropy-Based Weight method; TOPSIS; GREY RELATIONAL ANALYSIS; ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING; SIMILARITY MEASURES; SETS; INFORMATION; MAINTENANCE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/su11082265
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A new multi-criteria assessment model is proposed in this paper, which combines grey relational analysis (GRA) techniques with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy-based Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method, to solve multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems and to sort the alternatives. Generally speaking, the supplier selection process, by which buyers choose to find the right supplier of the high-quality products or/and services within the scheduled and quantity, is one of the most important key activities in constructing an effective and timely supply chain. On account of several conflicting attributes on which the knowledge of decision makers is often inaccurate and vague, this is a difficult problem. The contribution of this paper is not only to substitute objective weights of intuitionistic fuzzy entropy for subjective weights directly made by decision-makers in the TOPSIS method, but also to extend and modify this method with intuitionistic fuzzy sets and GRA techniques, and to propose the intuitionistic fuzzy entropy-based TOPSIS method combined with GRA techniques for selecting appropriate sustainable building materials supplier. Finally, we take the choice of sustainable building materials supplier as an example to illustrate the alternative effectively chosen by the intuitionistic fuzzy entropy-based TOPSIS method combined with GRA techniques.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, J PURCH MAT MANAG
[2]   Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi-criteria multi-person and multi-measurement tool decision making [J].
Atanassov, K ;
Pasi, G ;
Yager, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2005, 36 (14) :859-868
[3]  
Atanassov K., 1999, FUZZY SETS SYST, V61, P137, DOI DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(94)90229-1
[4]   Two theorems for intuitionistic fuzzy sets [J].
Atanassov, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 110 (02) :267-269
[5]   MORE ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 33 (01) :37-45
[6]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[7]  
Barbarosoglu G., 1997, Production and Inventory Management Journal, V38, P14
[8]   A fuzzy approach method for supplier selection [J].
Bayrak, M. Y. ;
Celebi, N. ;
Taskin, H. .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2007, 18 (01) :54-63
[9]   Integrated model for supplier selection and negotiation in a make-to-order environment [J].
Cakravastia, A ;
Takahashi, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2004, 42 (21) :4457-4474
[10]   Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach [J].
Chan, Felix T. S. ;
Kumar, N. ;
Tiwari, M. K. ;
Lau, H. C. W. ;
Choy, K. L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (14) :3825-3857