Neonatal foal handling

被引:37
作者
Simpson, BS [1 ]
机构
[1] Vet Behav Clin, Southern Pines, NC 28387 USA
关键词
neonatal foal handling; imprint training; learning in foals; heart rate; serum cortisol concentrations;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00107-7
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Recent interest has focused on the advantage of intensively handling young foals as a means of producing more tractable horses, accustomed to humans and receptive to training. To date, the effect of this intensive handling, dubbed "imprint training" in the popular literature, has not been tested. The present study compares seven foals handled intensively as neonates with eight untreated controls. The handling protocol started from 2-8 It after birth and continued daily for a total of 5 days. The protocol consisted of a series of stimuli and experiences that were each repeated until the foal no longer resisted or reacted negatively. Subsequently, foals were tested before weaning, at 4 months of age. Results indicated that handled foals (HF) ranked higher than control foals (CF) in subjective ratings of calmness (*P < 0.0117) and friendliness (***P < 0.0001) and in several specific handling tasks (venipuncture *P < 0.0220; placing in stock *P < 0.0128). Although, in approach tests all foals but one allowed approach of a person to 4 m, significantly more HF approached the person than CF (**P < 0.0080). In stimulus tests, foals were presented specific stimuli to which they had been tested as neonates. Two of eight CF were too unruly and dangerous to test. Of foals that could be tested, CF required significantly more time to hook-up a heart rate monitor (**P < 0.0055). Split-plot analysis indicated that HF had lower heart rates to initial left-sided stimuli, presented first, than CF (*P < 0.0421). In response to right-sided stimuli, heart rate scores of CF were not significantly different from HF (P < 0.2259), suggesting reduced reactivity over time due to a learning effect. Behavioral responses to specific stimuli did not differ between CF and HF, suggesting that neonatal handling has a general rather than specific effect on subsequent behavior. Cortisol concentrations were measured before and after testing and the difference calculated. All foals had higher post-testing levels than pre-testing levels. There was a significant difference between HF and CF, indicating greater reactivity among the CF (*P < 0.050). In general, the results indicated that foals handled as neonates were more tractable and less reactive. Specific neonatal handling tasks, such as sticking a finger up the foal's nose or patting the bottom of the foot, seemed to have no beneficial effect on related tasks such as passing a nasogastric tube or tapping with a farrier's hammer at 4 months of age. Mechanisms for the observed effect of neonatal handling require further investigation. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 317
页数:15
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Effect of gentle handling on the reactivity of zebu crossed calves to humans [J].
Becker, BG ;
Lobato, JFP .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1997, 53 (03) :219-224
[2]  
BROOM DM, 1993, STRESS ANIMAL WELFAR, P97
[3]  
BUDIANSKY S, 1997, NATURE HORSES EXPLOR, P171
[4]   THE EFFECT OF ORIENTATION DURING TRAILER TRANSPORT ON HEART-RATE, CORTISOL AND BALANCE IN HORSES [J].
CLARK, DK ;
FRIEND, TH ;
DELLMEIER, G .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1993, 38 (3-4) :179-189
[5]   Effects of handling aids on calf behavior [J].
Croney, CC ;
Wilson, LL ;
Curtis, SE ;
Cash, EH .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2000, 69 (01) :1-13
[6]   GROOMING AT A PREFERRED SITE REDUCES HEART-RATE IN HORSES [J].
FEH, C ;
DEMAZIERES, J .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1993, 46 (06) :1191-1194
[7]   THE EFFECTS OF HANDLING AT DIFFERENT AGES ON THE SUBSEQUENT LEARNING-ABILITY OF 2-YEAR-OLD HORSES [J].
HEIRD, JC ;
WHITAKER, DD ;
BELL, RW ;
RAMSEY, CB ;
LOKEY, CE .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1986, 15 (01) :15-25
[8]   EFFECTS OF EARLY EXPERIENCE ON THE LEARNING-ABILITY OF YEARLING HORSES [J].
HEIRD, JC ;
LENNON, AM ;
BELL, RW .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1981, 53 (05) :1204-1209
[9]  
HESS E, 1959, J COMP PHYSIOL PSYCH, V52, P516
[10]  
Houpt K. A., 1984, Equine Practice, V6, P38