Evolutionary rates across gradients

被引:14
作者
Weir, Jason T. [1 ,2 ]
Lawson, Adam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Biol Sci, Scarborough, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Scarborough, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
来源
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2015年 / 6卷 / 11期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
bird song; Brownian motion; continuous character; evolutionary rates; gradients; Ornstein Uhlenbeck; song learning; TRAIT EVOLUTION; R PACKAGE; ERROR; SIZE;
D O I
10.1111/2041-210X.12419
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. A key question in the fields of macroecology and evolution is how rates of evolution vary across gradients, be they ecological (e.g. temperature, rainfall, net primary productivity), geographic (e.g. latitude, elevation), morphological (e.g. body mass), etc. Evolutionary rates across gradients (EVORAG 2.0) is a new software package provided as open source in the R language (and available from CRAN) that tests whether rates of trait evolution vary continuously across such continuous gradients. 2. The approach uses quantitative trait data for a series of sister-pair contrasts (i.e. sister species or other types of sister taxa) and applies Brownian Motion and Ornstein Uhlenbeck models in which parameter (evolutionary rate and constraint) values vary as a function of discrete variables (e.g. male vs. female) and/or continuous variables (e.g. latitude, temperature, body size). 3. We used simulation to test performance of the models in EvoRAG. Our gradient models accurately estimate parameter values, have very low levels of bias, and low rates of model misspecification. 4. The modelling framework developed here provides great flexibility in designing models that test how rates of evolution vary across gradients. We provide an example where both discrete (songbird vs. suboscine) and continuous (latitude) effects on evolutionary rate in avian song were simultaneously estimated.
引用
收藏
页码:1278 / 1286
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, BIORXIV, DOI DOI 10.1101/004036
[2]  
Baptista Luis F., 1996, P39
[3]  
Beaulieu J., 2012, OUwie: analysis of evolutionary rates in an OU framework
[4]   Kullback-Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies [J].
Burnham, KP ;
Anderson, DR .
WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (02) :111-119
[5]   A NOVEL COMPARATIVE METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING SHIFTS IN THE RATE OF CHARACTER EVOLUTION ON TREES [J].
Eastman, Jonathan M. ;
Alfaro, Michael E. ;
Joyce, Paul ;
Hipp, Andrew L. ;
Harmon, Luke J. .
EVOLUTION, 2011, 65 (12) :3578-3589
[6]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 1973, AM J HUM GENET, V25, P471
[7]   Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: Contrasts revisited and revised [J].
Felsenstein, Joseph .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2008, 171 (06) :713-725
[8]   Diversitree: comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R [J].
FitzJohn, Richard G. .
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2012, 3 (06) :1084-1092
[9]  
Harmon LJ, 2005, EVOLUTION, V59, P2705
[10]   GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations [J].
Harmon, Luke J. ;
Weir, Jason T. ;
Brock, Chad D. ;
Glor, Richard E. ;
Challenger, Wendell .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 24 (01) :129-131