Plum pox in North America: Identification of aphid vectors and a potential role for fruit in virus spread

被引:57
作者
Gildow, F [1 ]
Damsteegt, V
Stone, A
Schneider, W
Luster, D
Levy, L
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Plant Pathol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Foreign Dis Weed Sci Res Unit, Ft Detrick, MD 21702 USA
[3] USDA, APHIS, CPHST, BARC E, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.8.868
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Thirteen aphid species were tested for their ability to transmit Pennsylvania isolates of Plum pox virus (PPV) collected in Columbia (PENN-3), Franklin (PENN-4), and York (PENN-7) Counties. PA. Four species, Aphis fabae, A. spiraecola. Brachycaudus persicae, and Myzus persicae, consistently transmitted PPV in preliminary transmission tests. TWO species, Metopolophium dirhodum and Rhopalosiphum padi, were occasional inefficient vectors. Toxoptera citricida, from Florida, also was an effective vector but it does not occur in major stone-fruit-growing states. Species not transmitting PPV in parallel tests included Acyrthosiphon pisum, Aphis glycines, Aulacorthum solani, Macrosiphum euphorbiae, Rhopalosiphum maidis, and Sitobion avenae. When given a 3-day probing access period Simultaneously on PPV-infected peach seedlings and healthy peach seedlings, Myzus persicae, Aphis spiraecola, A. fabae, and B. persicae transmitted PPV to 63, 3 1 38, and 32% of the healthy peach seedlings. respectively. When given a similar probing period on PPV-infected peach fruit and healthy peach seedlings, the same aphid species transmitted PPV to 50, 35, 0, and 0% of seedlings, respectively. Results support the hypothesis of secondary PPV spread by indigenous, aphids in Pennsylvania, and suggest that PPV-infected fruit has the potential to function as a virus source for long-distance dispersal.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 874
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Basky Z., 1997, J APHIDOL, V11, P21
[2]  
Blackman R. L., 2000, APHIDS WORLDS CROPS
[3]   COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS FOR ASSESSING PLUM POX VIRUS VARIABILITY - FURTHER EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF 2 MAJOR GROUPS OF ISOLATES [J].
BOUSALEM, M ;
CANDRESSE, T ;
QUIOTDOUINE, L ;
QUIOT, JB .
JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1994, 142 (02) :163-172
[4]   Comparison of monoclonal antibodies and polymerase chain reaction assays for the typing of isolates belonging to the D and M serotypes of plum pox potyvirus [J].
Candresse, T ;
Cambra, M ;
Dallot, S ;
Lanneau, M ;
Asensio, M ;
Gorris, MT ;
Revers, F ;
Macquaire, G ;
Olmos, A ;
Boscia, D ;
Quiot, JB ;
Dunez, J .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1998, 88 (03) :198-204
[5]  
CANDRESSE T, 1995, ACTA HORTIC, V386, P375
[6]   Peculiar plum pox potyvirus D-populations are epidemic in peach trees [J].
Dallot, S ;
Labonne, G ;
Boeglin, M ;
Quiot-Douine, L ;
Quiot, JB ;
Candresse, T .
17TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON VIRUS AND VIRUS-LIKE DISEASES OF TEMPERATE FRUIT CROPS: FRUIT TREE DISEASES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, (472) :355-365
[7]   Preliminary characterization of a North American isolate of Plum pox virus from naturally infected peach and plum orchards in Pennsylvania, USA [J].
Damsteegt, VD ;
Stone, AL ;
Luster, DG ;
Levy, L ;
Gildow, FE ;
Welliver, R .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON VIRUS & VIRUS-LIKE DISEASES OF TEMPERATE FRUIT CROPS - TOP FRUIT DISEASES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, (550) :145-152
[8]   Prunus tomentosa as a diagnostic host for detection of plum pox virus and other Prunus viruses [J].
Damsteegt, VD ;
Waterworth, HE ;
Mink, GI ;
Howell, WE ;
Levy, L .
PLANT DISEASE, 1997, 81 (04) :329-332
[9]  
Harris K.F., 1977, P165
[10]  
Isac M, 1998, ACTA VIROL, V42, P233