Comparing the effects of three different multilayer dressings for pressure ulcer prevention on sacral skin after prolonged loading: An exploratory crossover trial

被引:11
|
作者
Lechner, Anna [1 ]
Rancan, Fiorenza [1 ]
Hadam, Sabrina [1 ]
Vogt, Annika [1 ]
Blume-Peytavi, Ulrike [1 ]
Kottner, Jan [2 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Clin Res Ctr Hair & Skin Sci, Dept Dermatol Venereol & Allergy, Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Charite Ctr Hlth & Human Sci, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
IN-VIVO MEASUREMENTS; POLYURETHANE FILM; RELIABILITY; STIFFNESS; PROMOTES; EFFICACY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/wrr.12883
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Evidence suggests that preventive dressings applied on sacral skin help to prevent pressure ulcers. However, possible performance differences of different dressing types are unclear. An exploratory randomized crossover trial with intra-individual comparisons was conducted to compare the effects of three different multi-layer foam dressings (Mepilex Border Sacrum, ALLEVYN Life Sacrum and Optifoam Gentle Sacrum) compared to no dressing on the sacral skin. Healthy female volunteers (n = 12, mean age 72 years) wore three different dressings on their sacral skin for 3.5 hours while lying supine on a standard hospital mattress. At regular intervals, subjects performed standardized movements to enhance shear loads. Skin surface temperature, stratum corneum hydration, erythema, skin roughness and the interleukin 1 alpha (IL-1 alpha) concentration per total protein were measured at baseline and after the lying periods. After 3.5 hours, the median skin temperature increased in all four groups between 3.0 degrees C and 3.8 degrees C with only minor differences between the no dressing and the dressing groups. Median stratum corneum hydration increased during the lying period in all groups with highest increases in the Optifoam Gentle Sacrum (7.3 arbitrary units) and no dressing group (7.0 arbitrary units). There was a median decrease of the mean roughness (Rz) in the Optifoam Gentle Sacrum group of -6.3 mu m but no relevant changes in the other groups. After loading, the erythema index was highest in the ALLEVYN Life Sacrum and no dressing groups. Highest releases of IL-1 alpha were observed in the ALLEVYN Life Sacrum and Optifoam Gentle Sacrum groups, in the Mepilex Border Sacrum group changes were minor. Study results indicate, that the application of preventive dressings on sacral skin during loading do not cause additional occlusion compared to loading without dressings when lying supine. Different dressings cause different cutaneous responses during loading.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 279
页数:10
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Comparing the effects of 3 different pressure ulcer prevention support surfaces on the structure and function of heel and sacral skin: An exploratory cross-over trial
    Tomova-Simitchieva, Tsenka
    Lichterfeld-Kottner, Andrea
    Blume-Peytavi, Ulrike
    Kottner, Jan
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2018, 15 (03) : 429 - 437
  • [2] Effects of loading and prophylactic dressings on the sacral and heel skin: An exploratory cross-over trial
    Lichterfeld-Kottner, Andrea
    Vogt, Annika
    Tomova-Simitchieva, Tsenka
    Blume-Peytavi, Ulrike
    Kottner, Jan
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (06) : 909 - 922
  • [3] Effects of local cooling on sacral skin perfusion response to pressure: Implications for pressure ulcer prevention
    Tzen, Yi-Ting
    Brienza, David M.
    Karg, Patricia
    Loughlin, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2010, 19 (03) : 86 - 97
  • [4] Effects of Multilayer Silicone Foam Dressings for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Oe, Makoto
    Sasaki, Sanae
    Shimura, Tomoko
    Takaki, Yoshie
    Sanada, Hiromi
    ADVANCES IN WOUND CARE, 2020, 9 (12) : 649 - 656
  • [5] The effectiveness of two silicone dressings for sacral and heel pressure ulcer prevention compared with no dressings in high-risk intensive care unit patients: a randomized controlled parallel-group trial
    Hahnel, E.
    El Genedy, M.
    Tomova-Simitchieva, T.
    Hauss, A.
    Stroux, A.
    Lechner, A.
    Richter, C.
    Akdeniz, M.
    Blume-Peytavi, U.
    Loeber, N.
    Kottner, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 183 (02) : 256 - 264
  • [6] Effects of different dressings in the prevention of facial skin pressure injury related to non-invasive ventilation: Systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Zhang, Guoli
    Yan, Fanghong
    Sun, Ruiyi
    Peng, Guotian
    Pei, Juhong
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Ma, Yuxia
    Han, Lin
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2024, 21 (02)
  • [7] A randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn
    Jyothirmayi, Chinta Annie
    Halder, Ajay
    Yadav, Bijesh
    Samuel, Santosh Thomas
    Kuruvilla, Anil
    Jose, Ruby
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
  • [8] A randomized controlled double blind trial comparing the effects of the prophylactic antibiotic, Cefazolin, administered at caesarean delivery at two different timings (before skin incision and after cord clamping) on both the mother and newborn
    Chinta Annie Jyothirmayi
    Ajay Halder
    Bijesh Yadav
    Santosh Thomas Samuel
    Anil Kuruvilla
    Ruby Jose
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17