Advancements in Hurricane Prediction With NOAA's Next-Generation Forecast System

被引:47
作者
Chen, Jan-Huey [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Shian-Jiann [1 ]
Magnusson, Linus [3 ]
Bender, Morris [1 ,4 ]
Chen, Xi [1 ,4 ]
Zhou, Linjiong [1 ,4 ]
Xiang, Baoqiang [1 ,2 ]
Rees, Shannon [1 ,2 ]
Morin, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Harris, Lucas [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ocean & Atmospher Adm, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Univ Corp Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[3] European Ctr Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, Berks, England
[4] Princeton Univ, Atmospher & Ocean Sci Program, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
DYNAMICAL CORE; VERSION;
D O I
10.1029/2019GL082410
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
We use the fvGFS model developed at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory to demonstrate the potential of the upcoming United States Next-Generation Global Prediction System for hurricane prediction. The fvGFS retrospective forecasts initialized with the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) data showed much-improved track forecasts for the 2017 Atlantic hurricane season compared to the best-performing ECMWF operational model. The fvGFS greatly improved the ECMWF's poor track forecast for Hurricane Maria (2017). For Hurricane Irma (2017), a well-predicted case by the ECMWF model, the fvGFS produced even lower five-day track forecast errors. The fvGFS also showed better intensity prediction than both the United States and the ECMWF operational models, indicating the robustness of its numerical algorithms. Plain Language Summary When using European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts initial conditions, a new global weather model built at NOAA's Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory produces better hurricane forecast skill than the world-leading European model.
引用
收藏
页码:4495 / 4501
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [11] ECMWF Activities for Improved Hurricane Forecasts
    Magnusson, L.
    Bidlot, J-R
    Bonavita, M.
    Brown, A. R.
    Browne, P. A.
    De Chiara, G.
    Dahoui, M.
    Lang, S. T. K.
    Mcnally, T.
    Mogensen, K. S.
    Pappenberger, F.
    Prates, F.
    Rabier, F.
    Richardson, D. S.
    Vitart, F.
    Malardel, S.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 100 (03) : 445 - 458
  • [12] MILLER RJ, 1990, WEATHER FORECAST, V5, P653, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1990)005<0653:TATCFS>2.0.CO
  • [13] 2
  • [14] NOAA/GFDL, 2019, REAL TIM 10 DAY FVGS
  • [15] NOAA/NHC, 2018, AL112017 NOAANHC
  • [16] NOAA/NHC, 2017, NAT HURR CTR FOR VER
  • [17] NOAA/NHC, 2018, AL152017 NOAANHC
  • [18] NOAA/NWS, 2016, VER REP NGGPS PHAS 2
  • [19] Pollard R. T., 1973, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, V4, P381
  • [20] Finite-volume transport on various cubed-sphere grids
    Putman, William M.
    Lin, Shian-Hann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2007, 227 (01) : 55 - 78