Mixed Assessment Methodology in Engineering Higher Education based on Quality Control Concepts

被引:0
作者
Diaz, David [1 ]
Leo, Teresa J. [1 ]
Mora, Eleuterio [1 ]
Andres Somolinos, Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Madrid, ETSI Navales, Avda Arco de la Victoria 4, Madrid 28040, Spain
关键词
assessment; evaluation; engineering education; early reorientation; quality control; MODES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper outlines the adaptation of an assessment methodology in several courses in an engineering studies syllabus to the context of the new European Higher Education Area, through focusing on the best set of assessment methodologies that can be used, in order to improve learning processes without losing quality in the content. This is called a "mixed assessment methodology" and includes the implementation of different continuous assessments using virtual, manual or mechanical procedures. It allows teachers to manage large student numbers as well as to give them the required feedback. The paper classifies subjects into groups, based on their content and separates students by whether they are repeating the course or not, it addresses different assessment methodologies, incorporates engineering quality control concepts, and discusses the results achieved. The main contribution is to establish the best mixed assessment methodology for each subject in higher engineering education.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 437
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 90042009 ISO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, INTRO RES ED
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century
[5]  
Berliner D.C., 2002, Educational Researcher, V31, P18, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X031008018
[6]  
Dunlap J.C., 2003, PERFORM IMPROV Q, V16, P6, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-8327.2003.tb00276.x
[7]   Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy [J].
Dunlosky, John ;
Lipko, Amanda R. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 16 (04) :228-232
[8]   PEER FEEDBACK MARKING - DEVELOPING PEER ASSESSMENT [J].
FALCHIKOV, N .
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 32 (02) :175-187
[9]  
Falchikov N., 1986, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V11, P146, DOI [10.1080/0260293860110206, https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293860110206, DOI 10.1080/0260293860110206]
[10]  
Gielen S, 2003, INNOV CHANG PROF EDU, V1, P37