Avoiding preoperative breast MRI when conventional imaging is sufficient to stage patients eligible for breast conserving therapy

被引:22
作者
Pengel, Kenneth E. [1 ]
Loo, Claudette E. [1 ]
Wesseling, Jelle [2 ]
Pijnappel, Ruud M. [4 ]
Rutgers, Emiel J. Th [3 ]
Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Image Sci Inst, Dept Radiol, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast conserving therapy; Breast MRI; Staging; CANCER PATIENTS; IMPACT; MAMMOGRAPHY; LESIONS; MANAGEMENT; ACCURACY; BENEFIT; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.018
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aim: To determine when preoperative breast MRI will not be more informative than available breast imaging and can be omitted in patients eligible for breast conserving therapy (BCT). Methods: We performed an MRI in 685 consecutive patients with 692 invasive breast tumors and eligible for BCT based on conventional imaging and clinical examination. We explored associations between patient, tumor, and conventional imaging characteristics and similarity with MRI findings. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to compute the area under the curve (AUC). Results: MRI and conventional breast imaging were similar in 585 of the 692 tumors (85%). At univariate analysis, age (p < 0.001), negative preoperative lymph node status (p = 0.011), comparable tumor diameter at mammography and at ultrasound (p = 0.001), negative HER2 status (p = 0.044), and absence of invasive lobular cancer (p = 0.005) were significantly associated with this similarity. At multivariate analysis, these factors, except HER2 status, retained significant associations. The AUC was 0.68. Conclusions: It is feasible to identify a subgroup of patients prior to preoperative breast MRI, who will most likely show similar results on conventional imaging as on MRI. These findings enable formulation of a practical consensus guideline to determine in which patients a preoperative breast MRI can be omitted. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 278
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[3]  
Basset L., 2008, ACR PRACTICE GUIDELI
[4]   Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer [J].
Berg, WA ;
Gutierrez, L ;
NessAiver, MS ;
Carter, WB ;
Bhargavan, M ;
Lewis, RS ;
Ioffe, OB .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) :830-849
[5]   EUSOMA criteria for performing pre-operative MRI staging in candidates for breast conserving surgery: Hype or helpful? [J].
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Pellegrini, Marco ;
Valentini, Marvi ;
Houssami, Nehmat .
BREAST, 2012, 21 (03) :406-408
[6]   Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers - Discussion [J].
Grube, Baiba J. ;
Bethke, Kevin P. ;
Harken, Alden H. ;
Velasco, Jose M. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2007, 142 (05) :445-447
[7]  
Bleicher RJ, 2007, ONCOLOGY-NY, V21, P1521
[8]   Multifocal breast cancer and survival: Each focus does matter particularly for larger tumours [J].
Boyages, John ;
Jayasinghe, Upali W. ;
Coombs, Nathan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (11) :1990-1996
[9]   Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: Does each focus matter? [J].
Coombs, NJ ;
Boyages, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (30) :7497-7502
[10]   Contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy: complementary value for subgroups of patients [J].
Deurloo, EE ;
Zeggelink, WFAK ;
Teertstra, HJ ;
Peterse, JL ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Muller, SH ;
Bartelink, H ;
Gilhuijs, KGA .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (03) :692-701