The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients

被引:196
作者
Hamilton, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, NIHR Sch Primary Care Res, Dept Community Based Med, Bristol BS8 4AA, Avon, England
关键词
diagnosis; primary health care; predictive values; COLORECTAL-CANCER; CLINICAL-FEATURES; LUNG-CANCER; DIAGNOSIS; RECORDS; ANEMIA; COHORT;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6605396
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: This paper reviews the background to five primary care case-control studies, collectively known as the CAPER studies (Cancer Prediction in Exeter). These studies, on colorectal, lung, prostate and brain tumours, sought to identify the particular features of cancer as reported to primary care. They also sought to quantify the risk of cancer for symptoms and primary care investigations, both individually and paired together. METHODS: Two studies were on colorectal cancer: the former with 349 cases used hand searching and coding of entries, while the latter obtained 6442 cases from a national electronic database. The lung and prostate studies had 247 and 217 cases, respectively, and used manual methods. The brain study also used a national electronic database, which provided 3505 cases. RESULTS: Generally, the symptoms matched previous series from secondary care, though the risks of cancer, expressed as positive predictive values, were lower. Rectal bleeding in colorectal cancer, and haemoptysis in lung cancer both had positive predictive values of 2.4%. The risk of a brain tumour with headache was one in a thousand. INTERPRETATION: The results identify areas where current guidance on urgent referral for investigation of suspected cancer could be improved. British Journal of Cancer (2009) 101, S80-S86. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605396 www.bjcancer.com (C) 2009 Cancer Research UK
引用
收藏
页码:S80 / S86
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, CANC DIAGNOSIS PRIMA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, Referral guidelines for suspected cancer
  • [3] Pathways to the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: an observational study in three UK cities
    Barrett, J
    Jiwa, M
    Rose, P
    Hamilton, W
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2006, 23 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [4] *CANC RES UK, 2003, INC STAT
  • [5] Local impact of the English arm of the UK Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot Study
    Goodyear, S. J.
    Stallard, N.
    Gaunt, A.
    Parker, R.
    Williams, N.
    Wong, L.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (09) : 1172 - 1179
  • [6] The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case-control study using electronic primary care records
    Hamilton, W.
    Lancashire, R.
    Sharp, D.
    Peters, T. J.
    Cheng, K. K.
    Marshall, T.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 98 (02) : 323 - 327
  • [7] What are the clinical features of lung cancer before the diagnosis is made? - A population based case-control study
    Hamilton, W
    Peters, TJ
    Round, A
    Sharp, D
    [J]. THORAX, 2005, 60 (12) : 1059 - 1065
  • [8] Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study
    Hamilton, W
    Round, A
    Sharp, D
    Peters, TJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (04) : 399 - 405
  • [9] Diagnosis of colorectal cancer in primary care: the evidence base for guidelines
    Hamilton, W
    Sharp, D
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2004, 21 (01) : 99 - 106
  • [10] Hamilton WT, 2007, GUT, V56, pA49