Performance Characteristics of Glycated Albumin and Its Clinical Usefulness in Diabetic Patients on Hemodialysis

被引:3
作者
Park, Hae-il [1 ]
Kim, Yeong Sic [1 ]
Lee, Jehoon [1 ]
Kim, Yonggoo [1 ]
Shin, Seok Joon [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Lab Med, Coll Med, Seoul 150713, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Seoul 150713, South Korea
来源
KOREAN JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE | 2009年 / 29卷 / 05期
关键词
Glycated albumin; HbA1c; Glucose; Hemodialysis; Diabetes mellitus; NON-ENZYMATIC GLUCOSYLATION; GLYCOSYLATED SERUM-ALBUMIN; THIOBARBITURIC ACID ASSAY; HEMOGLOBIN A(1C) LEVELS; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; PREDICTOR; MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; INDEX; END;
D O I
10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.5.406
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The HbA1c has been considered to underestimate glucose level in diabetic patients on hemodialysis, therefore, glycated albumin (GA) was recently introduced to assess the glycemic control for those cases. We evaluated the performance of GA assay kit of Lucica GA-L (Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Japan) and compare it with HbA1c for estimating glucose levels. Methods : Tests for precision, linearity and interference were performed and reference interval was determined. Thirty eight of non-hemodialysis and seventy of hemodialysis patients were recruited, whose glucose levels of three-, two- and one-month prior to this study were available for calculating weighted means of glucose (WMGs). The correlation coefficients and the slopes of regression equation between WMG and HbA1c or GA were compared between two groups. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine significant predictor for HbA1c and GA. Results: Total CV was 2.2% at concentration of 13.7% and 2.8% at 24.6%, The dilution curve between 15.7% and 62.1% was linear. Reference intervals were 10.0% to 16.5% for male and 11.4% to 17.6% for female. The correlation coefficients between WMG and GA were 0.682-0.713 in hemodialysis and 0.640-0.677 in non-hemodialysis. Those between WMG and HbA1c were 0,568-0.625 in hemodialysis and 0.735-0.783 in non-hemodialysis. The slopes of regression equation between GA and WMG in hemodialysis were 0.080-0.090 and 0.130-0.147 in non-hemodialysis. Those between HbA1c and WMG in hemodialysis were 0.012-0.014 and 0.029-0.032 in non-hemodialysis. GA was not influenced by hemodialysis status while HbA1c was. Conclusions: The claimed performance characteristic of Lucica GA-L were verified. WMG were better reflected by GA rather than HbA1c in patients on hemodialysis. (Korean J Lab Med 2009;29:406-14)
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 414
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EP6A CLIN LAB STAND
[2]  
[Anonymous], EP7A2 CLIN LAB STAND
[3]   Assessing glycemic control in patients with diabetes and end-stage renal failure [J].
Ansari, A ;
Thomas, S ;
Goldsmith, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2003, 41 (03) :523-531
[4]   Indicators for blood glucose control in diabetics with end - stage chronic renal disease : GHb vs. glycated albumin (GA) [J].
Chujo, Keiko ;
Shima, Kenji ;
Tada, Hiroaki ;
Oohashi, Teruyo ;
Minakuchi, Jun ;
Kawashima, Syu .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION, 2006, 53 (3-4) :223-228
[5]  
*CLIN LAB STAND I, 2006, EP5A2 CLIN LAB STAND
[6]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2000, C28A2 CLIN LAB STAND
[7]   IMPROVEMENT OF THE THIOBARBITURIC ACID ASSAY FOR SERUM GLYCOSYLPROTEIN DETERMINATION [J].
DOLHOFER, R ;
WIELAND, OH .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1981, 112 (02) :197-204
[8]   REPRODUCIBILITY OF HEMOGLOBIN-ALC AND SENSITIVITY TO VARIOUS DEGREES OF GLUCOSE-INTOLERANCE [J].
DUNN, PJ ;
COLE, RA ;
SOELDNER, JS ;
GLEASON, RE .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1979, 91 (03) :390-396
[9]   Tests of glycemia in diabetes [J].
Goldstein, DE ;
Little, RR ;
Lorenz, RA ;
Malone, JI ;
Nathan, D ;
Peterson, CM ;
Sacks, DB .
DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (07) :1761-1773
[10]   ENHANCED NON-ENZYMATIC GLUCOSYLATION OF HUMAN-SERUM ALBUMIN IN DIABETES-MELLITUS [J].
GUTHROW, CE ;
MORRIS, MA ;
DAY, JF ;
THORPE, SR ;
BAYNES, JW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1979, 76 (09) :4258-4261