Comparison between Optimal Control Allocation with Mixed Quadratic & Linear Programming Techniques

被引:5
|
作者
Grechi, Simone [1 ]
Caiti, Andrea
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Informat Engn, Pisa, Italy
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2016年 / 49卷 / 23期
关键词
Optimal Control allocation; Quadratic Programming; Linear Programming; Mixed-Integer Linear Programming; Mixed-Integer Quadratic Programming;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.335
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The paper provides a comparison between different control allocation techniques in over-actuated Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. The pseudoinverse, Linear Programming (LP), Quadratic Programming (QP), Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) and Mixed Integer Quadratic Programming (MIQP) are evaluated in simulation on the V-Fides vehicle model. The MILP and MIQP techniques allow to include in their implementations a more detailed characterization of the non-linear static behaviour of the actuators. This customizability can be also exploited to improve the practical stability of the system. The metrics used for comparison include the maximum attainable forces and torques, the integral of the error allocation and the required thrusters effort. Our simulation results show that, in particular with respect to thrusters effort, MILP and MIQP are the preferred allocation methods. The computational complexity associated to both methods is not such to compromise their implementation in operating vehicles; in particular, the MILP version is currently implemented in the V-Fides vehicle. (C) 2016, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control) Hosting by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 152
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal power allocation for a FCHV based on linear programming and PID controller
    Fares, Dima
    Chedid, Riad
    Karaki, Sami
    Jabr, Rabih
    Panik, Ferdinand
    Gabele, Hugo
    Huang, Ying
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (36) : 21724 - 21738
  • [22] Mixed integer linear programming models for optimal crop selection
    Filippi, Carlo
    Mansini, Renata
    Stevanato, Elisa
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 81 : 26 - 39
  • [23] Optimal allocation of lift-gas rates under multiple facility constraints: A mixed integer linear programming approach
    Camponogara, Eduardo
    Nakashima, Paulo H. R.
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2006, 128 (04): : 280 - 289
  • [24] A mixed-integer linear programming approach for optimal type, size and allocation of distributed generation in radial distribution systems
    Rueda-Medina, Augusto C.
    Franco, John F.
    Rider, Marcos J.
    Padilha-Feltrin, Antonio
    Romero, Ruben
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2013, 97 : 133 - 143
  • [25] Globally Solving Nonconvex Quadratic Programs via Linear Integer Programming Techniques
    Xia, Wei
    Vera, Juan
    Zuluaga, Luis F.
    INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2020, 32 (01) : 40 - 56
  • [26] Control allocation of ASV based on linear programming and fuzzy logic
    Chi Pei
    Chen Zongji
    Zhou Rui
    SENSORS, AUTOMATIC MEASUREMENT, CONTROL, AND COMPUTER SIMULATION, PTS 1 AND 2, 2006, 6358
  • [27] Mixed Integer Linear Programming Formulation for Optimal Reactive Compensation and Voltage Control of Distribution Power Systems
    Castrillon, Jhon A.
    Giraldo, Juan S.
    Castro, Carlos A.
    2017 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2017,
  • [28] A comparison between mixed-integer linear programming and dynamic programming with state prediction as novelty for solving unit commitment
    Putz, Dominik
    Schwabeneder, Daniel
    Auer, Hans
    Fina, Bernadette
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2021, 125
  • [29] Optimal Coordination of Overcurrent Relays Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming
    Kida, A. A.
    Gallego, L. A.
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2016, 14 (03) : 1289 - 1295
  • [30] Mixed-integer linear programming for computing optimal experimental designs
    Harman, Radoslav
    Rosa, Samuel
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2025, 234