Pilot trial of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for population-based screening in BreastScreen Victoria

被引:26
|
作者
Houssami, Nehmat [1 ]
Lockie, Darren [2 ]
Clemson, Michelle [2 ]
Pridmore, Vicki [3 ]
Taylor, David [4 ]
Marr, Georgina [3 ]
Evans, Jill [3 ]
Macaskill, Petra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Eastern Hlth Breast & Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] BreastScreen Victoria, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Box Hill Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Mass screening; Mammography;
D O I
10.5694/mja2.50320
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To estimate detection measures for tomosynthesis and standard mammography; to assess the feasibility of using tomosynthesis in population-based screening for breast cancer. Design, setting Prospective pilot trial comparing tomosynthesis (with synthesised 2D images) and standard mammography screening of women attending Maroondah BreastScreen, a BreastScreen Victoria service in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne. Participants Women at least 40 years of age who presented for routine breast screening between 18 August 2017 and 8 November 2018. Main outcome measures Cancer detection rate (CDR); proportion of screens that led to recall for further assessment. Results 5018 tomosynthesis and 5166 standard mammography screens were undertaken in 10 146 women; 508 women (5.0% of screens) opted not to undergo tomosynthesis screening. With tomosynthesis, 49 cancers (40 invasive, 9 in situ) were detected (CDR, 9.8 [95% CI, 7.2-13] per 1000 screens); with standard mammography, 34 cancers (30 invasive, 4 in situ) were detected (CDR, 6.6 [95% CI, 4.6-9.2] per 1000 screens). The estimated difference in CDR was 3.2 more detections (95% CI, -0.32 to 6.8) per 1000 screens with tomosynthesis; the difference was greater for repeat screens and for women aged 60 years or more. The recall rate was greater for tomosynthesis (4.2%; 95% CI, 3.6-4.8%) than standard mammography (3.0%; 95% CI, 2.6-3.5%; estimated difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, 0.46-1.9%). The median screen reading time for tomosynthesis was 67 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] 46-105 seconds); for standard mammography, 16 seconds (IQR, 10-29 seconds). Conclusions Breast cancer detection, recall for assessment, and screen reading time were each higher for tomosynthesis than for standard mammography. Our preliminary findings could form the basis of a large scale comparative evaluation of tomosynthesis and standard mammography for breast screening in Australia. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000947303.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 362
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Breast cancers detected in only one of two arms of a tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) population screening trial (STORM-2)
    Bernardi, Daniela
    Houssami, Nehmat
    BREAST, 2017, 32 : 98 - 101
  • [32] Screening mammography and late-stage breast cancer: A population-based study
    Wu, Y
    Weissfeld, JL
    Weinberg, GB
    Kuller, LH
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1999, 28 (06) : 572 - 578
  • [33] Effect of integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population screening trial: A descriptive study
    Bernardi, Daniela
    Li, Tong
    Pellegrini, Marco
    Macaskill, Petra
    Valentini, Marvi
    Fanto, Carmine
    Ostillio, Livio
    Houssami, Nehmat
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 106 : 26 - 31
  • [34] Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: A pictorial review of screen-detected cancers and false recalls attributed to tomosynthesis in prospective screening trials
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Lang, Kristina
    Bernardi, Daniela
    Tagliafico, Alberto
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    Skaane, Per
    BREAST, 2016, 26 : 119 - 134
  • [35] Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study
    Kristina Lång
    Ingvar Andersson
    Aldana Rosso
    Anders Tingberg
    Pontus Timberg
    Sophia Zackrisson
    European Radiology, 2016, 26 : 184 - 190
  • [36] Community-Based Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Comparison of Screening Performance and Tumor Characteristics
    Regen-Tuero, Helaina C.
    Ram, Shruthi
    Gass, Jennifer S.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [37] 3D digital breast tomosynthesis versus US in evaluating breast asymmetries
    Mokhtar, Omnia
    Abd Elsalam, Sahar
    Gamal, Gehan
    Naguib, Eman
    Gomaa, Manal
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 51 (01)
  • [38] Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study
    Lang, Kristina
    Andersson, Ingvar
    Rosso, Aldana
    Tingberg, Anders
    Timberg, Pontus
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (01) : 184 - 190
  • [39] Costs and Effects of Implementing Digital Tomosynthesis in a Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening Program: Predictions Using Results from the To-Be Trial in Norway
    Moger, Tron Anders
    Holen, Asne
    Hanestad, Berit
    Hofvind, Solveig
    PHARMACOECONOMICS-OPEN, 2022, 6 (04) : 495 - 507
  • [40] Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based mammography screening
    Katharina Holland
    Ioannis Sechopoulos
    Ritse M. Mann
    Gerard J. den Heeten
    Carla H. van Gils
    Nico Karssemeijer
    Breast Cancer Research, 19