Pilot trial of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for population-based screening in BreastScreen Victoria

被引:26
|
作者
Houssami, Nehmat [1 ]
Lockie, Darren [2 ]
Clemson, Michelle [2 ]
Pridmore, Vicki [3 ]
Taylor, David [4 ]
Marr, Georgina [3 ]
Evans, Jill [3 ]
Macaskill, Petra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Eastern Hlth Breast & Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] BreastScreen Victoria, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Box Hill Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Mass screening; Mammography;
D O I
10.5694/mja2.50320
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To estimate detection measures for tomosynthesis and standard mammography; to assess the feasibility of using tomosynthesis in population-based screening for breast cancer. Design, setting Prospective pilot trial comparing tomosynthesis (with synthesised 2D images) and standard mammography screening of women attending Maroondah BreastScreen, a BreastScreen Victoria service in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne. Participants Women at least 40 years of age who presented for routine breast screening between 18 August 2017 and 8 November 2018. Main outcome measures Cancer detection rate (CDR); proportion of screens that led to recall for further assessment. Results 5018 tomosynthesis and 5166 standard mammography screens were undertaken in 10 146 women; 508 women (5.0% of screens) opted not to undergo tomosynthesis screening. With tomosynthesis, 49 cancers (40 invasive, 9 in situ) were detected (CDR, 9.8 [95% CI, 7.2-13] per 1000 screens); with standard mammography, 34 cancers (30 invasive, 4 in situ) were detected (CDR, 6.6 [95% CI, 4.6-9.2] per 1000 screens). The estimated difference in CDR was 3.2 more detections (95% CI, -0.32 to 6.8) per 1000 screens with tomosynthesis; the difference was greater for repeat screens and for women aged 60 years or more. The recall rate was greater for tomosynthesis (4.2%; 95% CI, 3.6-4.8%) than standard mammography (3.0%; 95% CI, 2.6-3.5%; estimated difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, 0.46-1.9%). The median screen reading time for tomosynthesis was 67 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] 46-105 seconds); for standard mammography, 16 seconds (IQR, 10-29 seconds). Conclusions Breast cancer detection, recall for assessment, and screen reading time were each higher for tomosynthesis than for standard mammography. Our preliminary findings could form the basis of a large scale comparative evaluation of tomosynthesis and standard mammography for breast screening in Australia. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000947303.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 362
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial
    Jakob Olinder
    Kristin Johnson
    Anna Åkesson
    Daniel Förnvik
    Sophia Zackrisson
    Breast Cancer Research, 25
  • [22] Increased Cancer Detection Rate and Variations in the Recall Rate Resulting from Implementation of 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis into a Population-based Screening Program
    Sharpe, Richard E., Jr.
    Venkataraman, Shambavi
    Phillips, Jordana
    Dialani, Vandana
    Fein-Zachary, Valerie J.
    Prakash, Seema
    Slanetz, Priscilla J.
    Mehta, Tejas S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (03) : 698 - 706
  • [23] Effectiveness of hybrid digital breast tomosynthesis/digital mammography compared to digital mammography in women presenting for routine screening at Maroondah BreastScreen: Study protocol for a co-designed, non-randomised prospective trial
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Lockie, Darren
    Giles, Michelle
    Doncovio, Sally
    Marr, Georgina
    Taylor, David
    Li, Tong
    Nickel, Brooke
    Marinovich, M. Luke
    BREAST, 2024, 74
  • [24] Impact of real-life use of artificial intelligence as support for human reading in a population-based breast cancer screening program with mammography and tomosynthesis
    Elias-Cabot, Esperanza
    Romero-Martin, Sara
    Raya-Povedano, Jose Luis
    Brehl, A. -K.
    Alvarez-Benito, Marina
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (06) : 3958 - 3966
  • [25] Population-based Mammography Screening and Breast Cancer Incidence in New South Wales, Australia
    Clayton Chiu
    Stephen Morrell
    Andrew Page
    Mary Rickard
    Ann Brassil
    Richard Taylor
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2006, 17 : 153 - 160
  • [26] Population-based mammography screening and breast cancer incidence in New South Wales, Australia
    Chiu, C
    Morrell, S
    Page, A
    Rickard, M
    Brassil, A
    Taylor, R
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2006, 17 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [27] Comparison of interval breast cancers with 2D digital mammography versus 3D digital breast tomosynthesis in a large community-based practice
    Winter, Andrea M.
    Kazmi, Sakina
    Hardy, Anna K.
    Bennett, Debbie L.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (10) : 1953 - 1959
  • [28] Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Bernardi, Daniela
    Pellegrini, Marco
    Valentini, Marvi
    Fanto, Carmine
    Ostillio, Livio
    Tuttobene, Paolina
    Luparia, Andrea
    Macaskill, Petra
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 47 : 94 - 99
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Population-based Breast Cancer Screening: A Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis
    Sankatsing, Valerie D. V.
    Juraniec, Karolina
    Grimm, Sabine E.
    Joore, Manuela A.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 297 (01) : 40 - 48
  • [30] MRI of the Breast as Part of the Assessment in Population-Based Mammography Screening
    Bick, U.
    Engelken, F.
    Diederichs, G.
    Dzyuballa, R.
    Ortmann, M.
    Fallenberg, E. M.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2013, 185 (09): : 849 - 856