Pilot trial of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for population-based screening in BreastScreen Victoria

被引:26
作者
Houssami, Nehmat [1 ]
Lockie, Darren [2 ]
Clemson, Michelle [2 ]
Pridmore, Vicki [3 ]
Taylor, David [4 ]
Marr, Georgina [3 ]
Evans, Jill [3 ]
Macaskill, Petra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Eastern Hlth Breast & Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] BreastScreen Victoria, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Box Hill Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Mass screening; Mammography;
D O I
10.5694/mja2.50320
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To estimate detection measures for tomosynthesis and standard mammography; to assess the feasibility of using tomosynthesis in population-based screening for breast cancer. Design, setting Prospective pilot trial comparing tomosynthesis (with synthesised 2D images) and standard mammography screening of women attending Maroondah BreastScreen, a BreastScreen Victoria service in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne. Participants Women at least 40 years of age who presented for routine breast screening between 18 August 2017 and 8 November 2018. Main outcome measures Cancer detection rate (CDR); proportion of screens that led to recall for further assessment. Results 5018 tomosynthesis and 5166 standard mammography screens were undertaken in 10 146 women; 508 women (5.0% of screens) opted not to undergo tomosynthesis screening. With tomosynthesis, 49 cancers (40 invasive, 9 in situ) were detected (CDR, 9.8 [95% CI, 7.2-13] per 1000 screens); with standard mammography, 34 cancers (30 invasive, 4 in situ) were detected (CDR, 6.6 [95% CI, 4.6-9.2] per 1000 screens). The estimated difference in CDR was 3.2 more detections (95% CI, -0.32 to 6.8) per 1000 screens with tomosynthesis; the difference was greater for repeat screens and for women aged 60 years or more. The recall rate was greater for tomosynthesis (4.2%; 95% CI, 3.6-4.8%) than standard mammography (3.0%; 95% CI, 2.6-3.5%; estimated difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, 0.46-1.9%). The median screen reading time for tomosynthesis was 67 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] 46-105 seconds); for standard mammography, 16 seconds (IQR, 10-29 seconds). Conclusions Breast cancer detection, recall for assessment, and screen reading time were each higher for tomosynthesis than for standard mammography. Our preliminary findings could form the basis of a large scale comparative evaluation of tomosynthesis and standard mammography for breast screening in Australia. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000947303.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 362
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2017, CAN SER AUSTR I HLTH, V106
[2]   Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time [J].
Bernardi, D. ;
Ciatto, S. ;
Pellegrini, M. ;
Anesi, V. ;
Burlon, S. ;
Cauli, E. ;
Depaoli, M. ;
Larentis, L. ;
Malesani, V. ;
Targa, L. ;
Baldo, P. ;
Houssami, N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1020) :E1174-E1178
[3]   Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study [J].
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Pellegrini, Marco ;
Valentini, Marvi ;
Fanto, Carmine ;
Ostillio, Livio ;
Tuttobene, Paolina ;
Luparia, Andrea ;
Houssami, Nehmat .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (08) :1105-1113
[4]   Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study [J].
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Caumo, Francesca ;
Pellegrini, Marco ;
Brunelli, Silvia ;
Tuttobene, Paola ;
Bricolo, Paola ;
Fanto, Carmine ;
Valentini, Marvi ;
Montemezzi, Stefania ;
Macaskill, Petra .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (07) :583-589
[5]   The impact of legislation mandating breast density notification - Review of the evidence [J].
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Lee, Christoph I. .
BREAST, 2018, 42 :102-112
[6]   Digital Breast Tomosynthesis A Brave New World of Mammography Screening [J].
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Miglioretti, Diana L. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2016, 2 (06) :725-727
[7]   Breast-Cancer Screening - Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group [J].
Lauby-Secretan, Beatrice ;
Scoccianti, Chiara ;
Loomis, Dana ;
Benbrahim-Tallaa, Lamia ;
Bouvard, Veronique ;
Bianchini, Franca ;
Straif, Kurt .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (24) :2353-2358
[8]   Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis or Mammography: A Meta-analysis of Cancer Detection and Recall [J].
Marinovich, M. Luke ;
Hunter, Kylie E. ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Houssami, Nehmat .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2018, 110 (09) :942-949
[9]   The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review [J].
Marmot, M. G. ;
Altman, D. G. ;
Cameron, D. A. ;
Dewar, J. A. ;
Thompson, S. G. ;
Wilcox, M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 108 (11) :2205-2240
[10]   Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation [J].
Nelson, Heidi D. ;
Fu, Rochelle ;
Cantor, Amy ;
Pappas, Miranda ;
Daeges, Monica ;
Humphrey, Linda .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 164 (04) :244-+