Pilot trial of digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for population-based screening in BreastScreen Victoria

被引:26
|
作者
Houssami, Nehmat [1 ]
Lockie, Darren [2 ]
Clemson, Michelle [2 ]
Pridmore, Vicki [3 ]
Taylor, David [4 ]
Marr, Georgina [3 ]
Evans, Jill [3 ]
Macaskill, Petra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Eastern Hlth Breast & Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] BreastScreen Victoria, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Box Hill Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Mass screening; Mammography;
D O I
10.5694/mja2.50320
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To estimate detection measures for tomosynthesis and standard mammography; to assess the feasibility of using tomosynthesis in population-based screening for breast cancer. Design, setting Prospective pilot trial comparing tomosynthesis (with synthesised 2D images) and standard mammography screening of women attending Maroondah BreastScreen, a BreastScreen Victoria service in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne. Participants Women at least 40 years of age who presented for routine breast screening between 18 August 2017 and 8 November 2018. Main outcome measures Cancer detection rate (CDR); proportion of screens that led to recall for further assessment. Results 5018 tomosynthesis and 5166 standard mammography screens were undertaken in 10 146 women; 508 women (5.0% of screens) opted not to undergo tomosynthesis screening. With tomosynthesis, 49 cancers (40 invasive, 9 in situ) were detected (CDR, 9.8 [95% CI, 7.2-13] per 1000 screens); with standard mammography, 34 cancers (30 invasive, 4 in situ) were detected (CDR, 6.6 [95% CI, 4.6-9.2] per 1000 screens). The estimated difference in CDR was 3.2 more detections (95% CI, -0.32 to 6.8) per 1000 screens with tomosynthesis; the difference was greater for repeat screens and for women aged 60 years or more. The recall rate was greater for tomosynthesis (4.2%; 95% CI, 3.6-4.8%) than standard mammography (3.0%; 95% CI, 2.6-3.5%; estimated difference, 1.2%; 95% CI, 0.46-1.9%). The median screen reading time for tomosynthesis was 67 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] 46-105 seconds); for standard mammography, 16 seconds (IQR, 10-29 seconds). Conclusions Breast cancer detection, recall for assessment, and screen reading time were each higher for tomosynthesis than for standard mammography. Our preliminary findings could form the basis of a large scale comparative evaluation of tomosynthesis and standard mammography for breast screening in Australia. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000947303.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 362
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interval cancer in the Cordoba Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (CBTST): comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis plus digital mammography to digital mammography alone
    Pulido-Carmona, Cristina
    Romero-Martin, Sara
    Raya-Povedano, Jose Luis
    Cara-Garcia, Maria
    Font-Ugalde, Pilar
    Elias-Cabot, Esperanza
    Pedrosa-Garriguet, Margarita
    Alvarez-Benito, Marina
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (08) : 5427 - 5438
  • [2] Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: data and implications for population screening
    Houssami, Nehmat
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (04) : 377 - 379
  • [3] Interval cancer in the Córdoba Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (CBTST): comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis plus digital mammography to digital mammography alone
    Pulido-Carmona, Cristina
    Romero-Martin, Sara
    Raya-Povedano, Jose Luis
    Cara-Garcia, Maria
    Font-Ugalde, Pilar
    Elias-Cabot, Esperanza
    Pedrosa-Garriguet, Margarita
    Alvarez-Benito, Marina
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (8) : 5427 - 5438
  • [4] Assessment of screen-recalled abnormalities for digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography screening in the BreastScreen Maroondah trial
    Li, Tong
    Lockie, Darren
    Clemson, Michelle
    Houssami, Nehmat
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 67 (03) : 242 - 251
  • [5] Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Per Skaane
    Sofie Sebuødegård
    Andriy I. Bandos
    David Gur
    Bjørn Helge Østerås
    Randi Gullien
    Solveig Hofvind
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 169 : 489 - 496
  • [6] Interval breast cancers in the 'screening with tomosynthesis or standard mammography' (STORM) population-based trial
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Bernardi, Daniela
    Caumo, Francesca
    Brunelli, Silvia
    Fanto, Carmine
    Valentini, Marvi
    Romanucci, Giovanna
    Gentilini, Maria A.
    Zorzi, Manuel
    Macaskill, Petra
    BREAST, 2018, 38 : 150 - 153
  • [7] Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Skaane, Per
    Sebuodegard, Sofie
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Gur, David
    Osteras, Bjorn Helge
    Gullien, Randi
    Hofvind, Solveig
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 169 (03) : 489 - 496
  • [8] A randomized controlled trial of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in population-based screening in Bergen: interim analysis of performance indicators from the To-Be trial
    Hildegunn S. Aase
    Åsne S Holen
    Kristin Pedersen
    Nehmat Houssami
    Ingfrid S. Haldorsen
    Sofie Sebuødegård
    Berit Hanestad
    Solveig Hofvind
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 1175 - 1186
  • [9] A randomized controlled trial of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in population-based screening in Bergen: interim analysis of performance indicators from the To-Be trial
    Aase, Hildegunn S.
    Holen, Asne S.
    Pedersen, Kristin
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Haldorsen, Ingfrid S.
    Sebuodegard, Sofie
    Hanestad, Berit
    Hofvind, Solveig
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (03) : 1175 - 1186
  • [10] Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program
    Hovda, Tone
    Brandal, Siri H. B.
    Sebuadegard, Sofie
    Holen, Asne S.
    Bjorndal, Hilde
    Skaane, Per
    Hofvind, Solveig
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (12) : 6991 - 6999