Validation of the PTSD checklist in an HMO sample of women

被引:179
作者
Walker, EA [1 ]
Newman, E
Dobie, DJ
Ciechanowski, P
Katon, W
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Div Consultat Liaison Psychiat, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Tulsa, Dept Psychol, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA
[3] Puget Sound Vet Adm Hlth Syst, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder; psychometrics;
D O I
10.1016/S0163-8343(02)00203-7
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Although Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is common among patients seeking care at medical clinics, little is known about the performance of screening instruments for this disorder in these settings. Previous studies of acute trauma populations using the PTSD Checklist (PCL) have suggested that scores of 45-50 provide the best discrimination between cases and noncases. We gave the PCL to 1,225 randomly selected women enrolled in an HMO. After interviewing a sample of 261 of these women using a structured, clinician-administered PTSD interview, we compared the results of the PCL to the clinician interviews over a range of possible cut scores. using Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis. The optimum balance of sensitivity and specificity for this population was a score of 30, yielding a sensitivity of .82 and specificity of .76. The positive and negative likelihood ratios for this cut score were 3.40 and 0.24, respectively. By comparison, the use of 45 as a cut score would result in very low sensitivity (.36) in this setting. The lower cut score found in this study may indicate that the use of previously published cut scores of 45-50 may not optimize the function of the PCL as a screening tool outside of acute trauma settings due to an unacceptably high number of false negative cases. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 380
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Andrykowski MA, 2000, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V9, P69
  • [2] Posttraumatic stress disorder after treatment for breast cancer: Prevalence of diagnosis and use of the PTSD checklist - Civilian version (PCL-C) as a screening instrument
    Andrykowski, MA
    Cordova, MJ
    Studts, JL
    Miller, TW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 66 (03) : 586 - 590
  • [3] Association A. P., 1994, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU
  • [4] INITIAL RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A NEW RETROSPECTIVE MEASURE OF CHILD-ABUSE AND NEGLECT
    BERNSTEIN, DP
    FINK, L
    HANDELSMAN, L
    FOOTE, J
    LOVEJOY, M
    WENZEL, K
    SAPARETO, E
    RUGGIERO, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 151 (08) : 1132 - 1136
  • [5] THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CLINICIAN-ADMINISTERED PTSD SCALE
    BLAKE, DD
    WEATHERS, FW
    NAGY, LM
    KALOUPEK, DG
    GUSMAN, FD
    CHARNEY, DS
    KEANE, TM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 1995, 8 (01) : 75 - 90
  • [6] Psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist (PCL)
    Blanchard, EB
    JonesAlexander, J
    Buckley, TC
    Forneris, CA
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1996, 34 (08) : 669 - 673
  • [7] Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in the community -: The 1996 Detroit Area Survey of Trauma
    Breslau, N
    Kessler, RC
    Chilcoat, HD
    Schultz, LR
    Davis, GC
    Andreski, P
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 55 (07) : 626 - 632
  • [8] Looking beyond the physical injury: Posttraumatic stress disorder in children and parents after pediatric traffic injury
    de Vries, APJ
    Kassam-Adams, N
    Cnaan, A
    Sherman-Slate, E
    Gallagher, PR
    Winston, FK
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 1999, 104 (06) : 1293 - 1299
  • [9] Screening for post-traumatic stress disorder in female Veteran's Affairs patients: validation of the PTSD checklist
    Dobie, DJ
    Kivlahan, DR
    Maynard, C
    Bush, KR
    McFall, M
    Epler, AJ
    Bradley, KA
    [J]. GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 24 (06) : 367 - 374
  • [10] PTSD, malevolent environment, and criminality among criminally involved male adolescents
    Erwin, BA
    Newman, E
    McMackin, RA
    Morrissey, C
    Kaloupek, DG
    [J]. CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (02) : 196 - 215