Engaging stakeholders to improve social validity: intervention priorities for students with complex communication needs

被引:18
作者
Biggs, Elizabeth E. [1 ]
Hacker, Rebecca [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Peabody Coll, Dept Special Educ, Box 228, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Special Educ, Urbana, IL USA
关键词
Augmentative and alternative communication; goals; qualitative methods; social validity; values and attitudes; IMPLEMENTATION; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/07434618.2021.1881824
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Many factors impact intervention implementation in everyday practice, including the social validity of these interventions. As a way of addressing social validity, this study aimed to understand the perspectives of multiple stakeholders of school-aged children and adolescents who use aided and unaided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) on their key intervention priorities for these children. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 parents and professionals, which included special education teachers, paraprofessionals, and speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Qualitative content analysis focused on (a) identifying a framework of intervention priorities for children with complex communication needs and (b) understanding stakeholders' underlying values and attitudes that influenced perceptions about these priorities. Participants shared many intervention priorities and several core values. These intervention priorities included approaches focused on improving children's intrinsic abilities (i.e., skills-focused) and on improving children's extrinsic supports and opportunities (i.e., environment-focused). However, participants often portrayed diverging attitudes about different aspects of intervention, particularly self-efficacy (e.g., persistence in the face of challenges; confidence about inclusive education) and perceptions of students (e.g., keeping high expectations). These findings have important implications for practice and future research related to how attention to social validity can help bridge the research-to-practice gap.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 38
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   AAC services in schools: a special educator's perspective [J].
Andzik, Natalie R. ;
Chung, Yun-Ching ;
Doneski-Nicol, Janis ;
Dollarhide, Colette T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2019, 65 (02) :89-97
[2]   Enhancing Peer Network Interventions for Students With Complex Communication Needs [J].
Biggs, Elizabeth E. ;
Carter, Erik W. ;
Bumble, Jennifer L. ;
Barnes, Kelli ;
Mazur, Erica L. .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2018, 85 (01) :66-85
[3]  
Biggs EE, 2017, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH-BASED PRACTICES FOR EDUCATING STUDENTS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY, P235
[4]   Children's Perspectives on Their Relationships with Friends with and Without Complex Communication Needs [J].
Biggs, Elizabeth Erin ;
Snodgrass, Melinda R. .
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES, 2020, 45 (02) :81-97
[5]   Social Validation of Vocabulary Selection: Ensuring Stakeholder Relevance [J].
Bornman, Juan ;
Bryen, Diane Nelson .
AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2013, 29 (02) :174-181
[6]   Qualitative studies in special education [J].
Brantlinger, E ;
Jimenez, R ;
Klingner, J ;
Pugach, M ;
Richardson, V .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2005, 71 (02) :195-207
[7]   Statewide Assessment of Professional Development Needs Related to Educating Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder [J].
Brock, Matthew E. ;
Huber, Heartley B. ;
Carter, Erik W. ;
Juarez, A. Pablo ;
Warren, Zachary E. .
FOCUS ON AUTISM AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 29 (02) :67-79
[8]  
Browder D.M., 2014, More language arts, math, and science for students with significant cognitive disabilities
[9]  
Brown D, 2020, CAMBR MEDIEV CELT ST, P9
[10]   A meta-synthesis of team members' voices: what we need and what we do to support students who use AAC [J].
Chung, Yun-Ching ;
Stoner, Julia B. .
AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2016, 32 (03) :175-186