Crossover Effects of Unilateral Static Stretching and Foam Rolling on Contralateral Hamstring Flexibility and Strength

被引:41
|
作者
Killen, Benjamin S. [1 ]
Zelizney, Krista L. [2 ]
Ye, Xin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Related Profess, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Nicole Werthe Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Univ Mississippi, Dept Hlth Exercise Sci & Recreat Management, University, MS 38677 USA
关键词
range of motion; isometric; electromyography; PEAK TORQUE; MUSCLE; RANGE; PERFORMANCE; MASSAGE; ROLLER; MOTION; DECREASES; POWER; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1123/jsr.2017-0356
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Context: Static stretching (SS) and self-administered foam rolling (SAFR) are both effective techniques often used in rehabilitation settings to improve one's range of motion (ROM). However, their effects on nonintervened contralateral limb's performance remain equivocal. Objective: To examine the acute effects of unilateral hamstring's SS and SAFR on the contralateral hip-flexion passive ROM and the strength performance. Design: Randomized crossover trial. Setting: Controlled laboratory. Participants: A total of 23 healthy young adults (13 males and 10 females) participated in this investigation. Interventions: Ten sets of 30-second SS or SAFR were performed on the participants' dominant hamstring muscles. Main Outcome Measures: Before (pre) and after (post) the interventions, the contralateral hip-flexion passive ROM, the isometric strength of the contralateral hamstrings, and surface electromyography amplitude were measured. Separate 2-way (time x intervention) repeated measures analyses of variance were used to examine the changes in the dependent variables. Results: Both interventions significantly increased the contralateral hip-flexion passive ROM. In addition, the post-ROM value was significantly greater (P = .03) for the SS (mean +/- SE = 73.5 degrees +/- 4.7 degrees) than that for the SAFR (mean +/- SE = 70.3 degrees +/- 4.5 degrees). There were also main effects for time (P = .03) and intervention (P = .02) for the contralateral hamstring strength. However, no significant interaction or main effects were found for the normalized electromyography amplitude of the knee flexor muscles. Conclusions: The increased contralateral hip-flexion passive ROM following both interventions was likely due to the enhanced stretch tolerance. However, the differential strength performance responses might be due to different neural mechanisms, which are proposed and discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 539
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Immediate effects of quantified hamstring stretching: Hold-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation versus static stretching
    Puentedura, Emilio J.
    Huijbregts, Peter A.
    Celeste, Shelley
    Edwards, Dale
    In, Alastair
    Landers, Merrill R.
    Fernandez-de-las-Penas, Cesar
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2011, 12 (03) : 122 - 126
  • [42] Effects of seven weeks of static hamstring stretching on flexibility and sprint performance in young soccer players according to their playing position
    Rodriguez Fernandez, Alejandro
    Sanchez, Javier
    Rodriguez-Marroyo, Jose A.
    Villa, Jose G.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2016, 56 (04) : 345 - 351
  • [43] Influence of High Intensity 20-Second Static Stretching on the Flexibility and Strength of Hamstrings
    Takeuchi, Kosuke
    Nakamura, Masatoshi
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE AND MEDICINE, 2020, 19 (02) : 429 - 435
  • [44] The effect of time and frequency of static stretching on flexibility of the hamstring muscles
    Bandy, WD
    Irion, JM
    Briggler, M
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1997, 77 (10): : 1090 - 1096
  • [45] Foam Rolling vs. Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching in the Hamstring Flexibility of Amateur Athletes: Control Trials
    Perez-Bellmunt, Albert
    Casasayas-Cos, Oriol
    Ragazzi, Paolo
    Rodriguez-Sanz, Jacobo
    Hidalgo-Garcia, Cesar
    Canet-Vintro, Max
    Caballero-Martinez, Ivan
    Pacheco, Laura
    Lopez-de-Celis, Carlos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (02)
  • [46] Immediate Effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching Programs Compared With Passive Stretching Programs for Hamstring Flexibility: A Critically Appraised Topic
    Hill, Kristian J.
    Robinson, Kendall P.
    Cuchna, Jennifer W.
    Hoch, Matthew C.
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2017, 26 (06) : 567 - 572
  • [47] Influence of static stretching on hamstring flexibility in healthy young adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Medeiros, Diulian M.
    Cini, Anelize
    Sbruzzi, Graciele
    Lima, Claudia S.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2016, 32 (06) : 438 - 445
  • [48] ACUTE EFFECT OF A BALLISTIC AND A STATIC STRETCHING EXERCISE BOUT ON FLEXIBILITY AND MAXIMAL STRENGTH
    Bacurau, Reury Frank Pereira
    Monteiro, Gizele de Assis
    Ugrinowitsch, Carlos
    Tricoli, Valmor
    Cabral, Leonardo Ferreira
    Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2009, 23 (01) : 304 - 308
  • [49] Comparison of the effects of 4-week instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization and static stretching on strength, ROM, flexibility, and painthreshold in hamstring muscle shortness
    Maras, Gokhan
    Arikan, Halime
    Citaker, Seyit
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2024, 40 : 575 - 583
  • [50] Dynamic and static stretching on hamstring flexibility and stiffness: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cai, Peng
    Liu, Lewen
    Li, Hai
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (08)