Occupational exposure in the electrophysiology laboratory: quantifying and minimizing radiation burden

被引:66
作者
Theocharopoulos, N.
Damilakis, J.
Perisinakis, K.
Manios, E.
Vardas, P.
Gourtsoyiannis, N.
机构
[1] Univ Crete, Fac Med, Dept Med Phys, Iraklion 71003, Crete, Greece
[2] Univ Crete, Fac Med, Dept Cardiol, Iraklion 71003, Crete, Greece
[3] Univ Crete, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Iraklion 71003, Crete, Greece
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr/76128583
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Fluoroscopically guided procedures in the electrophysiology room, such as radiofrequency catheter ablation and implantation of cardiac resynchronization devices, may result in high radiation exposure of electrophysiologists and assisting staff. Our aim was to provide accurate and applicable data on occupational doses to the electrophysiology laboratory personnel. We exposed fluoroscopically an anthropomorphic phantom at three projections common in electrophysiology studies. For each exposure, scattered radiation was measured at 182 sites of the cardiology room at four body levels. Effective dose values, eye lens, skin and gonadal doses to the laboratory staff were calculated. Our study has shown that a procedure requiring 40 min of fluoroscopy yields a maximum effective dose of 129 mu Sv and a maximum value of gonadal dose of 56.8 mu Sv to staff using a 0.35 mm lead-equivalent apron. A conservative estimate of the electrophysiologist's annual maximum permissible; workload is 155 procedures. Staff effective dose values vary by a factor of 40 due to positioning during fluoroscopy and by a factor of 11 due to radiation protection equipment. Undercouch protective shields may reduce gonadal doses up to 98% and effective dose up to 25%. Consequently, radiation levels in the electrophysiology room are not negligible. Mitigation of occupational exposure is feasible through good fluoroscopy and working practices.
引用
收藏
页码:644 / 651
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Annals of the ICRP, V21
[2]   Stray radiation in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory [J].
Balter, S .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2001, 94 (1-2) :183-188
[3]  
Balter S, 1999, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V47, P347, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199907)47:3<347::AID-CCD23>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-N
[5]   Device therapy for heart failure [J].
Boehmer, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (6A) :53D-59D
[6]   RADIATION EXPOSURE DURING RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION OF ACCESSORY ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONNECTIONS [J].
CALKINS, H ;
NIKLASON, L ;
SOUSA, J ;
ELATASSI, R ;
LANGBERG, J ;
MORADY, F .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 84 (06) :2376-2382
[7]   Results of catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter [J].
Calkins, H ;
Canby, R ;
Weiss, R ;
Taylor, G ;
Wells, P ;
Chinitz, L ;
Milstein, S ;
Compton, S ;
Oleson, K ;
Sherfesee, L ;
Onufer, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 94 (04) :437-442
[8]   Anticipation of radiation dose to the conceptus from occupational exposure of pregnant staff during fluoroscopically guided electrophysiological procedures [J].
Damilakis, J ;
Perisinakis, K ;
Theocharopoulos, N ;
Tzedakis, A ;
Manios, E ;
Vardas, P .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (07) :773-780
[9]  
HALL EJ, 1994, RADIOBIOLOGY RADIOLO, P363
[10]  
ICRP, 1995, ANN ICRP, V26, P15