RETRACTION: lncRNA IGF2-AS Promotes Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Gastric Cancer by Modulating miR-937/EZH2 Axis (Retraction of May, 10.1089/CBR.2019.3275, 2020)

The article entitled, "lncRNA IGF2-AS Promotes Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Gastric Cancer by Modulating miR-937/EZH2 Axis," by Zizi Li, Zhanyu Li, Zhijuan Zhong, Jianhui Zhou, Shenhao Huang, Wenying Zhou, and Jianfeng Xu (Cancer Biother Radiopharm epub 25 May 2020; Doi: 10.1089/cbr.2019.3275) is being officially retracted from the literature. The Editor-in-Chief of Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals (CBR) received an email from the corresponding author of the article, Wenying Zhou, on September 7, 2020, indicating: " horizontal ellipsis this manuscript should no longer be published [because of] information from our superior and also after discussion with my research team, we want to repeat our experiment and then revise the [manuscript]. Our team has a lot of controversy about these results. In order to ensure the quality of the data and not to mislead readers, we decided to [retract] the manuscript. We will be more rigorous in our further study." The editor requested further information about precisely which data could not be reproduced, to which Dr. Wenying Zhou responded: " horizontal ellipsis we found that the results of Figure 4B and 4C, Figure 5A and 5B could not be repeated. Our repeated results of Figure 4B and 4C were as follow[s]: compared with miR-NC group, there was no significant decrease of the luciferase activity in miR-937 group when cells co-transfected with EZH2 3 '-UTR-WT. Our repeated results of Figure 5A and 5B were as follow[s]: miR-937 inhibited the proliferation of MNK-28 and SGC-7901 cells, but the cell proliferation had no significant change in miR-937+EZH2 group compared with miR-937+pcDNA group. These findings resulted in the uncertainty of the targeted relationship between miR-937 and EZH2. We also repeated these experiments in different environments, but they all contradict the results in the original data. So, the conclusion is very controversial. In a responsible attitude to the readers, we decide to [retract] the manuscript." The authors have extended their apologies to the Editor and to the readers of CBR. Though in the author's original email, the request was made to "withdraw" the paper, CBR has decided to fully retract it due to irreproducible data, as the journal is committed to preserving the scientific literature and the community it serves.