Energetic, economic, and environmental assessment of a Stirling engine based gasification CCHP system

被引:35
|
作者
Chen, Jialing [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Li, Xian [3 ,4 ]
Dai, Yanjun [1 ,4 ]
Wang, Chi-Hwa [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Res Ctr Solar Energy & Refrigerat, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, 4 Engn Dr 4, Singapore 117585, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Environm Res Inst, Singapore 138602, Singapore
[4] Energy & Environm Sustainabil Solut Megac E2S2, Campus Res Excellence & Technol Enterprise CREATE, Singapore 138602, Singapore
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Biomass gasification; Stirling engine; CCHP; Food waste; 3E analysis; POWER-GENERATION SYSTEM; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; FLUIDIZED-BED; THERMODYNAMIC ASSESSMENT; WOODY BIOMASS; WASTE; GASIFIER; SYNGAS; COAL; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116067
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Due to the tar contamination caused by the gasification process of biomass, the internal combustion engine (ICE) based gasification cogeneration systems require complicated gas cleaning devices to purify producer gas. In this paper, a Stirling engine based gasification combined cooling, heat and power (CCHP) system was introduced, which has the capability of mitigating tar condensation and contamination. The gasification CCHP system, including the gasification system, the Stirling engine system, and the absorption chiller system, can provide electricity, heat and cooling for a commercial building. The effects of the equivalence ratio on syngas composition and cold gas efficiency of the gasification process were analyzed herein. The optimal systems in Singapore and Shanghai can save respectively 75.9% and 70.5% levelized total cost compared to a conventional reference system. The Stirling engine based CCHP system had advantages over the ICE systems on overall consideration of the levelized total cost and the primary energy saving ratio. The monthly energetic, economic and environmental performance of the CCHP systems was evaluated under different modes and the above two systems' primary energy saving ratios, operation cost reduction ratios and CO2 equivalent reduction ratios respectively reached 0.886, 0.462 and 0.701 in Singapore and 0.908, 0.535 and 0.710 in Shanghai in annual operation. The outcomes of this paper contribute to the design and deployment of such a CCHP system, and the developed models and analysis framework can be extended to different climate areas.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental and exergoeconomic assessments of a novel biomass gasification based solid oxide fuel cell and heat engine hybrid energy system
    Tripathi, Abhishek Kumar
    Patra, Indrajit
    Kumar, Narukullapati Bharath
    Majdi, Ali
    Muda, Iskandar
    Mahdavi, Ali
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2022, 44 (04) : 8490 - 8511
  • [22] Assessment of supercritical water gasification process for combustible gas production from thermodynamic, environmental and techno-economic perspectives: A review
    Chen, Jingwei
    Liang, Jiamin
    Xu, Zhengyong
    E, Jiaqiang
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 226 (226)
  • [23] Model-based research on a micro cogeneration system with Stirling engine
    Chmielewski, Adrian
    Guminski, Robert
    Maczak, Jedrzej
    Szulim, Przemyslaw
    JOURNAL OF POWER TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, 96 (04): : 295 - 305
  • [24] Energy, exergy, environmental, and economic modeling of combined cooling, heating and power system with Stirling engine and absorption chiller
    Sheykhi, Mohammad
    Chahartaghi, Mahmood
    Balakheli, Mohammad Mandi
    Kharkeshi, Behrad Alizadeh
    Miri, Seyyed Mandi
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 180 : 183 - 195
  • [25] Energy, exergy, environmental, and economic evaluations of a proposed CCHP system based on solar, biomass, SOFC, micro-turbine, and LiBr/water absorption chiller
    Soleimani, M.
    Mosaffa, A. H.
    Fallah, M.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2024, 190
  • [26] Environmental impact assessment of VOC emissions from biomass gasification power generation system based on life cycle analysis
    Sun, Yunqi
    Wang, Shuo
    Yang, Qing
    Li, Jianlan
    Wang, Liang
    Zhang, Shihong
    Yang, Haiping
    Chen, Hanping
    FUEL, 2023, 335
  • [27] COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF BIOMASS GASIFICATION PATHWAY FOR GREEN PRODUCTION
    Ganesh, Gautham Srinivas
    Dasappa, S.
    Patil, Balachandra
    Shivapuji, Anand M.
    DETRITUS, 2025, 30 : 75 - 83
  • [28] Techno-Economic and Environmental Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Energetic Valorization
    Machin, Einara Blanco
    Pedroso, Daniel Travieso
    Acosta, Daviel Gomez
    Silva dos Santos, Maria Isabel
    de Carvalho, Felipe Solferini
    Machin, Adrian Blanco
    Neira Ortiz, Matias Abner
    Sanchez Arriagada, Reinaldo
    Travieso Fernandez, Daniel Ignacio
    Braga Maciel, Lucia Bollini
    Cuevas Arcos, Daniel
    Guerra Reyes, Yanet
    de Carvalho Junior, Joao Andrade
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (23)
  • [29] Thermodynamic analysis of SOFC-CCHP system based on municipal sludge plasma gasification with carbon capture
    Zhang, Jifu
    Cui, Peizhe
    Yang, Sheng
    Zhou, Yaru
    Du, Wei
    Wang, Yinglong
    Deng, Chengwei
    Wang, Shuai
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 336
  • [30] The Cogeneration System Based On Solid Biomass Using Stirling Engine
    Oros , Teodora
    Vadan, Ioan
    Ceclan, Andrei
    2014 49TH INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (UPEC), 2014,